Bug 696488

Summary: Cannot load /etc/httpd/modules/mod_proxy.so into server: /etc/httpd/modules/mod_proxy.so: undefined symbol: ap_get_server_banner
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Jan Hutař <jhutar>
Component: httpdAssignee: Joe Orton <jorton>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: BaseOS QE Security Team <qe-baseos-security>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: urgent    
Version: 5.7CC: cperry, prc, slukasik
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Regression
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-07-21 08:53:00 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 677498    

Description Jan Hutař 2011-04-14 06:58:42 UTC 
Description of problem:
I have default RHEL5.7-Server-20110413.1_nfs-x86_64 installed and when I try to install RHN Satellite on top of it, I'm getting syntax error when httpd is being restarted.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
httpd-2.2.3-49.el5


How reproducible:
1 of 1 attempt


Steps to Reproduce:
1. install RHEL5.7-Server-20110413.1
2. install RHN Satellite 5.4.0 (not sure if this is a required step)
3. # service httpd restart


Actual results:
# service httpd restart
Stopping httpd: [FAILED]
Starting httpd: httpd: Syntax error on line 188 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load /etc/httpd/modules/mod_proxy.so into server: /etc/httpd/modules/mod_proxy.so: undefined symbol: ap_get_server_banner
[FAILED]


Expected results:
Should wok as expected


Additional info:
# rpm -qfV /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf
<no output>
Comment 1 Šimon Lukašík 2011-04-14 07:08:00 UTC 
This is a regression against httpd-2.2.3-48.el5
Comment 2 Joe Orton 2011-04-14 12:13:48 UTC 
This was a mismerge in the patch for bug 658766.
Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2011-07-21 08:53:00 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1067.html
Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2011-07-21 11:48:37 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1067.html