Bug 696488 - Cannot load /etc/httpd/modules/mod_proxy.so into server: /etc/httpd/modules/mod_proxy.so: undefined symbol: ap_get_server_banner
Summary: Cannot load /etc/httpd/modules/mod_proxy.so into server: /etc/httpd/modules/m...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: httpd
Version: 5.7
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
urgent
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Joe Orton
QA Contact: BaseOS QE Security Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: sat541-triage
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-04-14 06:58 UTC by Jan Hutař
Modified: 2012-03-08 09:06 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-07-21 08:53:00 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2011:1067 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE httpd bug fix and enhancement update 2011-07-21 08:51:15 UTC

Description Jan Hutař 2011-04-14 06:58:42 UTC
Description of problem:
I have default RHEL5.7-Server-20110413.1_nfs-x86_64 installed and when I try to install RHN Satellite on top of it, I'm getting syntax error when httpd is being restarted.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
httpd-2.2.3-49.el5


How reproducible:
1 of 1 attempt


Steps to Reproduce:
1. install RHEL5.7-Server-20110413.1
2. install RHN Satellite 5.4.0 (not sure if this is a required step)
3. # service httpd restart


Actual results:
# service httpd restart
Stopping httpd: [FAILED]
Starting httpd: httpd: Syntax error on line 188 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load /etc/httpd/modules/mod_proxy.so into server: /etc/httpd/modules/mod_proxy.so: undefined symbol: ap_get_server_banner
[FAILED]


Expected results:
Should wok as expected


Additional info:
# rpm -qfV /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf
<no output>

Comment 1 Šimon Lukašík 2011-04-14 07:08:00 UTC
This is a regression against httpd-2.2.3-48.el5

Comment 2 Joe Orton 2011-04-14 12:13:48 UTC
This was a mismerge in the patch for bug 658766.

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2011-07-21 08:53:00 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1067.html

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2011-07-21 11:48:37 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1067.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.