Bug 697975 (CVE-2011-1749)
Summary: | CVE-2011-1749 nfs-utils: mount.nfs fails to anticipate RLIMIT_FSIZE | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Other] Security Response | Reporter: | Vincent Danen <vdanen> |
Component: | vulnerability | Assignee: | Red Hat Product Security <security-response-team> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | unspecified | CC: | jlayton, mjc, steved, yanwang |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Security |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-02-21 08:24:31 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 697977, 697978, 697979, 697980, 697981, 697982 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 716955, 742493 |
Description
Vincent Danen
2011-04-19 19:45:20 UTC
Created nfs-utils tracking bugs for this issue Affects: fedora-all [bug 697982]
> 146 return (res < 0) ? 1 : ((fflush(mfp->mntent_fp) == 0) ? 0 : 1);
Dear god, no. There's no reason to do all of that one one line.
If I'm reading it right though, the logic looks correct, but let's do something that's a little easier to read (and debug...)
Looks like this does not affect the version in RHEL4 as I can't see any mention of addmntent() or nfs_addmntent() anywhere (the only reference to mtab seems to be in nfs-utils-1.0.6/utils/rquotad/mntent.h). Jeff, can you confirm whether or not this is an issue for RHEL4? Thanks. This was assigned CVE-2011-1749. Statement: This issue did not affect the versions of nfs-utils as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 as it did not include include mount.nfs. It was addressed in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 and 6 via RHSA-2012:0310 and RHSA-2011:1534 respectively. This issue has been addressed in following products: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Via RHSA-2011:1534 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1534.html This issue has been addressed in following products: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Via RHSA-2012:0310 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0310.html |