Bug 703719
Summary: | Review Request: spice-xpi - mozilla extension for spice client | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Peter Hatina <phatina> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Hans de Goede <hdegoede> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, hdegoede, notting, tsmetana |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | hdegoede:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | spice-xpi-2.5-2.fc15 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-06-21 17:11:29 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Peter Hatina
2011-05-11 07:55:58 UTC
*** Bug 703720 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** I'll review this and if all goes well sponsor Peter, assigning to me. Hi, Full review done: Good: ===== - package meets naming guidelines - spec file legible, in am. english - package compiles on devel (x86) - no missing BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file Needs work: =========== - rpmlint checks return: [hans@shalem ~]$ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/spice-xpi-2.5-1.fc15.src.rpm rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/spice-xpi-* spice-xpi.src: W: invalid-url Source0: spice-xpi-2.5.tar.bz2 spice-xpi.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.5.1 ['2.5-1.fc15', '2.5-1'] 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Both will need to be fixed: -now that we've an official tarbal up please replace Source0 with: Source0: http://spice-space.org/download/releases/%{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2 -The version in the changelog should be 2.5-1 not 2.5.1 -Note that you're supposed to bump the release field each time you make changes, even during review so the next changelog entry should have: 2.5-2 (and Release: near the top should be 2) - please drop the tarname and tarversion macro-s they are identical to Name resp Release and rpm automatically defines %{name} and %{version} for these. - License: should be: "MPLv1.1 or GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+" - please change the URL to http://spice-space.org - please drop BuildRoot, it is not needed in recent Fedora (no in epel-6 or newer) - likewise drop the "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" from %install and the entire %clean section - please drop the gcc-c++ BuildRequires, gcc-c++ is part of the default buildroot, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#BuildRequires (and then exceptions list) - please add a comment explaining why ExclusiveArch is used in this case simply add the following line above the ExclusiveArch line: # https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613529 - Please drop the following Requires: -log4cpp, this is a used library, rpm automatically generates dependencies for dynamically linked libraries -firefox, this plugin should be usable in other browsers too - please drop the " -n %{tarname}-%{tarversion}" arguments to %setup, %setup uses " -n %{name}-%{version}" as default - make dist has already generated configure and Makefile.in, etc. No need to redo that, please drop the following calls from %build: aclocal libtoolize --automake autoheader automake --add-missing autoconf - with these dropped the following BuildRequires can also be removed: BuildRequires: automake BuildRequires: libtool BuildRequires: autoconf - the standard for %defattr used in Fedora is: %defattr(-,root,root,-) - it is convention to have the %doc line as the first line after %defattr in %files Regards, Hans Now, it should be fixed. SRPM URL: http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xhatin01/spice-xpi/spice-xpi-2.5-2.fc15.src.rpm Looks good now, approved. If you let me know your FAS account name I'll add you to the packagers group and sponsor you. For more info on getting a FAS account if you don't have one already and the next steps after sponsoring, see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join My fedora account name is "phatina". OK, I've added you to the packagers group and sponsored you, next step is to create a package scm admin request, so that a new module can be created in pkg git and bugzilla for spice-xpi. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests Note it may take up to an hour for your new rights to propagate, so if you cannot set the fedora-cvs flag, that is why. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: spice-xpi Short Description: Spice extension for Mozilla allows the client to be used from a web browser. Owners: phatina Branches: f14 f15 InitialCC: jwrdegoede Git done (by process-git-requests). spice-xpi-2.5-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spice-xpi-2.5-2.fc15 spice-xpi-2.5-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/spice-xpi-2.5-2.fc14 spice-xpi-2.5-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 testing repository. spice-xpi-2.5-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. spice-xpi-2.5-2.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. |