Bug 705061

Summary: rebase netcf for RHEL 6.2
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Laine Stump <laine>
Component: netcfAssignee: Laine Stump <laine>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 6.1CC: dallan, dyuan, ohudlick, rwu, vbian
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Rebase
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: netcf-0.1.9-1.el6 Doc Type: Rebase: Bug Fixes and Enhancements
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-06 15:19:00 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Laine Stump 2011-05-16 14:25:58 UTC
netcf will have an API addition needed to suport transactional network config change (Bug 569567). In general it is a very bad idea to make API changes in a simple patch release (probably it is forbidden, but I haven't checked). Therefore we will need to rebase the RHEL build of netcf after its API has been changed.

Comment 3 Laine Stump 2011-06-14 21:36:38 UTC
A fix for this bug is included in netcf-0.1.8-1.el6. A build is available here:

https://brewweb.devel.redhat.com/buildinfo?buildID=167451

Comment 6 Laine Stump 2011-07-26 16:02:33 UTC
A fix for this bug is included in netcf-0.1.9-1.el6. A build is available here:

https://brewweb.devel.redhat.com/buildinfo?buildID=173822

Comment 8 Vivian Bian 2011-08-04 06:50:15 UTC
checked with netcf-0.1.9-1.el6

1. rpm name has been changed from netcf-0.1.8-1.el6 to netcf-0.1.9-1.el6
2. change log has been written with correct versions 
3. Bug 569567 has been fixed with netcf-0.1.9-1.el6 

So set bug status to VERIFIED

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 15:19:00 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1631.html