Bug 70582

Summary: can't double-click last visible file in file upload dialog
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Public Beta Reporter: Kris Urquhart <kurquhart>
Component: mozillaAssignee: Christopher Blizzard <blizzard>
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME QA Contact: Ben Levenson <benl>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: limbo   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-08-02 19:20:40 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Kris Urquhart 2002-08-02 19:16:15 UTC 
Description of Problem:
I found this while trying to add an attachment to a bugzilla.  While browsing, I
visited a directory that had many files in it, but the one I wanted was the last
one visible in the dialog (but not the last file in the directory).  When I went
to double-click on it, the first click caused the list to scroll up one line,
and so did the second click.  Double-clicking on files in the middle of the list
works fine.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
mozilla-1.0.1-10


How Reproducible:
Very

Steps to Reproduce:
1. start to attach a file to a bugzilla
2. browse to a directory that has lots of files in it
3. try to double-click on the last file visible in the list (but not the last
file in the directory)

Actual Results:
list scrolls up two lines

Expected Results:
double-clicking should select the desired file

Additional Information:
screen resolution 1152x864
stock fonts
Comment 1 Kris Urquhart 2002-08-02 19:20:35 UTC 
The actual results are even worse - the file two lines down is selected.  In my
case, I am in /var, and trying to select "log", but the list scrolls down two
and then descends into "mail".
Comment 2 Christopher Blizzard 2002-08-30 14:41:48 UTC 
Works for me in 1.0.1-23.
Comment 3 Kris Urquhart 2002-08-31 00:28:04 UTC 
I agree it now works fine, thanks!