| Summary: | Create new libvirt-snmp package | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Bhavna Sarathy <bsarathy> | |
| Component: | libvirt-snmp | Assignee: | Daniel Veillard <veillard> | |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs> | |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | ||
| Priority: | high | |||
| Version: | 6.2 | CC: | borgan, dallan, mjenner, notting, rwu, syeghiay, xhu | |
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | FutureFeature | |
| Target Release: | --- | |||
| Hardware: | All | |||
| OS: | Linux | |||
| Whiteboard: | ||||
| Fixed In Version: | libvirt-snmp-0.0.2-1.el6 | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 725450 725532 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-12-06 14:49:05 UTC | Type: | --- | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Bug Depends On: | ||||
| Bug Blocks: | 693512, 725450, 725532 | |||
|
Description
Bhavna Sarathy
2011-05-19 14:21:43 UTC
This would not just be a subpackage of libvirt? it's been created a new sub-project libvirt-snmp: git://libvirt.org/libvirt-snmp.git However, libvirt-snmp will be a new package in RHEL6.2. Please clarify if this package is going to be part of a new or existing comps group or if this will be pulled in as a dependency. (In reply to comment #4) > Please clarify if this package is going to be part of a new or existing comps > group or if this will be pulled in as a dependency. Nothing depends on libvirt-snmp. I don't understand the comps group question, can you explain? If nothing depends on a package, it needs to be listed in a package group (they're called comps groups) so it will actually be pulled into the tree. From a brief look, it seems appropriate for the 'virtualization-platform' group, alongside libvirt-cim, libvirt-qpid, etc. (In reply to comment #7) > If nothing depends on a package, it needs to be listed in a package group > (they're called comps groups) so it will actually be pulled into the tree. > > From a brief look, it seems appropriate for the 'virtualization-platform' > group, alongside libvirt-cim, libvirt-qpid, etc. Yes, that would be appropriate. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-1609.html |