Bug 706114 - Create new libvirt-snmp package
Summary: Create new libvirt-snmp package
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: libvirt-snmp
Version: 6.2
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Daniel Veillard
QA Contact: Virtualization Bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 693512 725450 725532
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2011-05-19 14:21 UTC by Bhavna Sarathy
Modified: 2015-06-11 01:09 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version: libvirt-snmp-0.0.2-1.el6
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 725450 725532 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-12-06 14:49:05 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHEA-2011:1609 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE new package: libvirt-snmp 2011-12-06 00:51:09 UTC

Description Bhavna Sarathy 2011-05-19 14:21:43 UTC
Request to add a new package libvirt-snmp to RHEL6.2.

The origins of the request is:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642556

there will be dependencies on glibc, net-snmp-libs and libvirt-client,
so they should be on the approved components list.

Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2011-05-19 18:50:01 UTC
This would not just be a subpackage of libvirt?

Comment 3 Bhavna Sarathy 2011-05-19 18:59:24 UTC
it's been created a new sub-project libvirt-snmp:
   git://libvirt.org/libvirt-snmp.git

However, libvirt-snmp will be a new package in RHEL6.2.

Comment 4 Siddharth Nagar 2011-05-24 13:30:22 UTC
Please clarify if this package is going to be part of a new or existing comps group or if this will be pulled in as a dependency.

Comment 6 Dave Allan 2011-06-16 14:03:28 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> Please clarify if this package is going to be part of a new or existing comps
> group or if this will be pulled in as a dependency.

Nothing depends on libvirt-snmp.  I don't understand the comps group question, can you explain?

Comment 7 Bill Nottingham 2011-06-30 14:25:11 UTC
If nothing depends on a package, it needs to be listed in a package group (they're called comps groups) so it will actually be pulled into the tree.

From a brief look, it seems appropriate for the 'virtualization-platform' group, alongside libvirt-cim, libvirt-qpid, etc.

Comment 9 Dave Allan 2011-07-14 13:57:20 UTC
(In reply to comment #7)
> If nothing depends on a package, it needs to be listed in a package group
> (they're called comps groups) so it will actually be pulled into the tree.
> 
> From a brief look, it seems appropriate for the 'virtualization-platform'
> group, alongside libvirt-cim, libvirt-qpid, etc.

Yes, that would be appropriate.

Comment 14 errata-xmlrpc 2011-12-06 14:49:05 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-1609.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.