| Summary: | avoid a build failure without downstream patches and introduce a way to exclude test-suite | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Kamil Dudka <kdudka> | ||||
| Component: | valgrind | Assignee: | Jakub Jelinek <jakub> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | qe-baseos-tools-bugs | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | medium | ||||||
| Version: | 6.1 | CC: | mfranc, pmuller | ||||
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | EasyFix, Patch | ||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | valgrind-3.6.0-4.el6 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2011-12-06 16:28:01 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Kamil Dudka
2011-05-27 21:02:24 UTC
Created attachment 501396 [details]
proposed fix
For the time being try rawhide valgrind (3.6.1-3.fc16). The first hunk is the same there, the testsuite is (hopefully) solved by moving it into %check section. valgrind-3.6.1-3.1.fc16 is much more friendly with the Coverity analysis. I only needed the following one-line patch to get the vanilla build running with glibc-2.14:
--- a/valgrind.spec
+++ b/valgrind.spec
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@
%patch5 -p1
%patch6 -p1
%patch7 -p1
-%patch8 -p1
+%patch8 -p1 %{?_rawbuild}
%patch9 -p1
%patch10 -p1
%patch11 -p1
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-1651.html |