Bug 710648
| Summary: | Review Request: clusterPy - Custom analytical geographic regionalization | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Volker Fröhlich <volker27> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | bloch, fedora-package-review, gwync, ktdreyer, notting |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | ktdreyer:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | clusterPy-0.9.9-3.fc16 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-10-13 23:55:20 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Volker Fröhlich
2011-06-03 22:01:22 UTC
Argh, messy! Updated description and summary: Spec URL: http://www.geofrogger.net/review/clusterPy.spec SRPM URL: http://www.geofrogger.net/review/clusterPy-0.9.9-2.fc14.src.rpm Description: Analytical regionalization is a scientific way to decide how to group or cluster a large number of geographic areas or points into a smaller number of regions based on their similarities. ClusterPy offers the following clustering algorithms: Arisel, AZP, AZP-Simulated Annealing, AZP-Tabu, AZP-R-Tabu, Max-p-regions (Tabu), AMOEBA, SOM and geoSOM. Summary: Analytical regionalization and spatial clustering of geographic areas OK - MUST: rpmlint must be run on source and binaries
$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-16-i386/result/clusterPy-0.9.9-2.fc16.noarch.rpm
clusterPy.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Analytical -> Analytically, Analytic, Catalytic
clusterPy.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) regionalization -> rationalization, marginalization, denationalization
clusterPy.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Analytical -> Analytically, Analytic, Catalytic
clusterPy.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US regionalization -> rationalization, marginalization, denationalization
clusterPy.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Arisel -> Ariel, Arise, Arises
clusterPy.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US geoSOM -> geom
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.
$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-16-i386/result/clusterPy-0.9.9-2.fc16.src.rpm
clusterPy.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Analytical -> Analytically, Analytic, Catalytic
clusterPy.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) regionalization -> rationalization, marginalization, denationalization
clusterPy.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Analytical -> Analytically, Analytic, Catalytic
clusterPy.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US regionalization -> rationalization, marginalization, denationalization
clusterPy.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Arisel -> Ariel, Arise, Arises
clusterPy.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US geoSOM -> geom
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.
$ rpmlint clusterPy.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
False positives on spelling. No problems here.
OK - MUST: named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
OK - MUST: spec file name matches the base package %{name}
OK - MUST: package meets the Packaging Guidelines
OK - MUST: license file included in %doc
OK - MUST: spec is in American English
OK - MUST: spec is legible
OK - MUST: sources match the upstream source by MD5
392beb2c03b14f710055c33547ec7ced
OK - MUST: successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on F15/16.
N/A - MUST: no ExcludeArch.
OK - MUST: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
N/A - MUST: handles locales properly with %find_lang
N/A - MUST: calls ldconfig in %post and %postun
OK - MUST: does not bundle copies of system libraries.
N/A - MUST: not designed to be relocatable
OK - MUST: owns all directories that it creates
OK - MUST: no duplicate files in the %files listing
OK - MUST: permissions on files are set properly
OK - MUST: consistently uses macros
OK - MUST: package contains code, or permissable content
N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage
OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application
N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package
N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package
N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix, then library
files that end in .so must go in a -devel package.
N/A - MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned
dependency
OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives.
N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file
OK - MUST: package does not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
OK - MUST: all filenames valid UTF-8
SHOULD Items:
OK - SHOULD: Source package includes license text(s) as a separate file.
N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file
should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
OK - SHOULD: builds in mock.
OK - SHOULD: compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
OK - SHOULD: functions as described.
OK - SHOULD: Scriptlets are sane.
N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency.
N/A - SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg
OK - SHOULD: no file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or
/usr/sbin
Other items:
OK - latest stable version
OK - SourceURL valid
Issues:
Personal nit: no need for "index.html" in the URL. It's sort of like extraneous uses of "cat" in shell scripts :)
APPROVED
Thank you for reviewing, Ken! I'll change the URL for the actual build. Please include an SCM request when setting the fedora-cvs flag, thanks! https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests Sorry, out of my mind! New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: clusterPy Short Description: Library of spatially constrained clustering algorithms Owners: volter Branches: f15 f16 And the BZ isn't assigned to the reviewer, and the review flag isn't set to +. :) Sorry Jon, thanks :) New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: clusterPy Short Description: Library of spatially constrained clustering algorithms Owners: volter Branches: f15 f16 Git done (by process-git-requests). No worries, thanks! clusterPy-0.9.9-3.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/clusterPy-0.9.9-3.fc16 clusterPy-0.9.9-3.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/clusterPy-0.9.9-3.fc15 clusterPy-0.9.9-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. clusterPy-0.9.9-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. clusterPy-0.9.9-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. |