Bug 712272 (ghc-unix-compat)
Summary: | Review Request: ghc-unix-compat - A portable POSIX-compatibility layer for Haskell | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Jens Petersen <petersen> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, haskell-devel, notting, petersen |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | petersen:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | ghc-unix-compat-0.2.1.3-1.fc16 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-09-18 14:07:18 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 630303, 712659, 736577 |
Description
Narasimhan
2011-06-10 04:28:12 UTC
I'd like to review this. Lakshmi, do you have time to update it? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3268684 rpmlint -i ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/ghc-unix-compat-devel-0.2.2.1-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/ghc-unix-compat-0.2.2.1-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ghc-unix-compat-0.2.2.1-1.fc15.src.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Spec file http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-unix-compat.spec SRPM link: http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-unix-compat-0.2.2.1-1.fc15.src.rpm Note that 0.3 is available but better to wait to upgrade since it will break current snap, yesod and yi. http://packdeps.haskellers.com/reverse/unix-compat Here is the review: +:ok, NA: not applicable MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint output rpmlint is clean [+] MUST: Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: spec file name must match base package %{name} [+] MUST: Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: Licensing Guidelines [+] MUST: License field in the package spec file must match actual license. [+] MUST: include license files in %doc if available in source [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English and be legible. [+] MUST: source md5sum matches upstream release 24e9b96aa702b3d28e1c5edb5f0160a7 unix-compat-0.2.2.1.tar.gz [+] MUST: must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on one main arch [+] MUST: if necessary use ExcludeArch for other archs [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [NA] MUST: use %find_lang macro for .po translations [NA] MUST: packages which store shared library files in the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [NA] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [NA] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [NA] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [NA] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives [NA] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. Package is APPROVED. Thanks for the review. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-unix-compat Short Description: A portable POSIX-compatibility layer for Haskell Owners: narasim Branches: f14 f15 f16 InitialCC: haskell-sig Git done (by process-git-requests). ghc-unix-compat-0.2.1.3-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-unix-compat-0.2.1.3-1.fc16 ghc-unix-compat-0.2.1.3-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-unix-compat-0.2.1.3-1.fc15 ghc-unix-compat-0.2.1.3-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-unix-compat-0.2.1.3-1.fc14 ghc-unix-compat-0.2.1.3-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. ghc-unix-compat-0.2.1.3-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. ghc-unix-compat-0.2.1.3-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. ghc-unix-compat-0.2.1.3-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. |