Spec file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-unix-compat.spec SRPM file : http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-unix-compat-0.2.1.3-1.fc14.src.rpm Koji build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3122645 rpmlint output: ghc-unix-compat-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-unix-compat-devel Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package itself. ghc-unix-compat-prof.i686: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. ghc-unix-compat-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-7.0.2/unix-compat-0.2.1.3/libHSunix-compat-0.2.1.3_p.a A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a development package. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. Required for yi.
I'd like to review this. Lakshmi, do you have time to update it?
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3268684 rpmlint -i ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/ghc-unix-compat-devel-0.2.2.1-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/ghc-unix-compat-0.2.2.1-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ghc-unix-compat-0.2.2.1-1.fc15.src.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Spec file http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-unix-compat.spec SRPM link: http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-unix-compat-0.2.2.1-1.fc15.src.rpm
Note that 0.3 is available but better to wait to upgrade since it will break current snap, yesod and yi. http://packdeps.haskellers.com/reverse/unix-compat Here is the review: +:ok, NA: not applicable MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint output rpmlint is clean [+] MUST: Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: spec file name must match base package %{name} [+] MUST: Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: Licensing Guidelines [+] MUST: License field in the package spec file must match actual license. [+] MUST: include license files in %doc if available in source [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English and be legible. [+] MUST: source md5sum matches upstream release 24e9b96aa702b3d28e1c5edb5f0160a7 unix-compat-0.2.2.1.tar.gz [+] MUST: must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on one main arch [+] MUST: if necessary use ExcludeArch for other archs [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [NA] MUST: use %find_lang macro for .po translations [NA] MUST: packages which store shared library files in the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [NA] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [NA] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [NA] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [NA] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives [NA] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. Package is APPROVED.
Thanks for the review. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-unix-compat Short Description: A portable POSIX-compatibility layer for Haskell Owners: narasim Branches: f14 f15 f16 InitialCC: haskell-sig
Git done (by process-git-requests).
ghc-unix-compat-0.2.1.3-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-unix-compat-0.2.1.3-1.fc16
ghc-unix-compat-0.2.1.3-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-unix-compat-0.2.1.3-1.fc15
ghc-unix-compat-0.2.1.3-1.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-unix-compat-0.2.1.3-1.fc14
ghc-unix-compat-0.2.1.3-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository.
ghc-unix-compat-0.2.1.3-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.
ghc-unix-compat-0.2.1.3-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.
ghc-unix-compat-0.2.1.3-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.