Bug 713695

Summary: Warning: more packages were installed by yum than expected
Product: Red Hat Satellite 5 Reporter: Dimitar Yordanov <dyordano>
Component: InstallerAssignee: Milan Zázrivec <mzazrivec>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Red Hat Satellite QA List <satqe-list>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 541CC: jpazdziora
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-04-15 12:43:27 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 462714    

Description Dimitar Yordanov 2011-06-16 09:28:15 UTC
Description of problem:
During the installation process of Satellite 5.4.1 
  Satellite-5.4.1-RHEL6-re20110615.0-x86_64-embedded-oracle.iso
the following warning is displayed:

* Applying updates.
* Installing RHN packages.
Warning: more packages were installed by yum than expected:
	java-1.5.0-gcj
	java_cup
	perl-Error
	sinjdoc
Warning: yum did not install the following packages:
	libXpm
* Now running spacewalk-setup.
* Loading answer file: /root/SAT/answers.txt.


The issue is not presented on  RHEL5 - Satellite-5.4.1-RHEL5-re20110615.0-i386-embedded-oracle.iso.


It seems that similar issue has been resolved for Sat 5.4.0.

Bug 640585 - Warning: more packages were installed by yum than expected
 
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Satellite-5.4.1-RHEL6-re20110615.0-x86_64-embedded-oracle.iso
RHEL 6.1

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Insatall Satellite 5.4.1 (Satellite-5.4.1-RHEL6-re20110615.0-x86_64-embedded-oracle.iso) on RHEL6.1

  
Actual results:
Warning is displayed.

Expected results:
No Warnings.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Jan Pazdziora 2013-04-15 12:43:27 UTC
Fixed for Satellite 5.5 via bug 816065.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 709335 ***