| Summary: | Review Request: CSparse - Sparse Matrix software library | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, jamatos, notting, rc040203 |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2011-06-29 17:21:56 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 713925 | ||
|
Description
Tom "spot" Callaway
2011-06-16 19:02:41 UTC
Package name does not comply to FPG. The tarball is called CSparse* Fair enough: Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/CSparse.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/CSparse-3.0.1-1.fc15.src.rpm While following bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714716 I noticed that Fedora already has suitesparse pkg, https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/suitesparse that aggregates several sparse libraries: $ yum info suitesparse Installed Packages Name : suitesparse ... Summary : A collection of sparse matrix libraries URL : http://www.cise.ufl.edu/research/sparse/SuiteSparse License : LGPLv2+ and GPLv2+ Description : suitesparse is a collection of libraries for computations involving sparse : matrices. The package includes the following libraries: ... : CSparse a concise sparse matrix package ... whiteout going further into the details is this a different package? If it is I will have closer look and I will review the package. Its not a different package, so this is not necessary. Good catch. |