Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||FTBFS <ftbfs>|
|Component:||ruby||Assignee:||Jeroen van Meeuwen <vanmeeuwen+fedora>|
|Status:||CLOSED WONTFIX||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||16||CC:||dan, jeremy, karsten, mmorsi, mtasaka, tagoh, vanmeeuwen+fedora, vondruch|
|Target Milestone:||---||Keywords:||Reopened, Triaged|
|Fixed In Version:||ruby-220.127.116.114-4.fc16||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2013-02-13 21:31:14 EST||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description FTBFS 2011-06-23 11:59:37 EDT
ruby-18.104.22.1684-2.fc16.src.rpm Failed To Build From Source against the rawhide tree. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS for more information. If you believe this is actually a bug in another package, do NOT change the component in this bug or close this bug. Instead, add the appropriate bug number from the other package to the "Depends on" line in this bug. If the other package does not yet have a bug created that you think matches, please create one. Doing so helps us properly track bugs and their dependencies, just as we track package dependencies. (If you close this bug, and the other package is not fixed before the next FTBFS run, a new bug will get created. Please follow the above advice to avoid such duplication.)
Comment 1 FTBFS 2011-06-23 11:59:41 EDT
Created attachment 508438 [details] root.log root.log for i386
Comment 2 FTBFS 2011-06-23 11:59:42 EDT
Created attachment 508439 [details] build.log build.log for i386
Comment 3 FTBFS 2011-06-23 11:59:43 EDT
Created attachment 508440 [details] mock.log mock.log for i386
Comment 4 FTBFS 2011-06-23 11:59:45 EDT
Created attachment 508441 [details] root.log root.log for x86_64
Comment 5 FTBFS 2011-06-23 11:59:46 EDT
Created attachment 508442 [details] build.log build.log for x86_64
Comment 6 FTBFS 2011-06-23 11:59:48 EDT
Created attachment 508443 [details] mock.log mock.log for x86_64
Comment 7 Mamoru TASAKA 2011-06-23 12:30:23 EDT
Well, callback.func is generated under ext/dl but it is broken by unknown reason. [tasaka1@localhost dl]$ rm -f tmp.* [tasaka1@localhost dl]$ ruby mkcallback.rb > tmp.1 [tasaka1@localhost dl]$ ruby mkcallback.rb >> tmp.2 [tasaka1@localhost dl]$ ruby mkcallback.rb | cat > tmp.3 [tasaka1@localhost dl]$ ruby mkcallback.rb | cat >> tmp.4 [tasaka1@localhost dl]$ ls -al tmp.* -rw------- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 86016 6月 24 01:04 tmp.1 -rw------- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 88060 6月 24 01:04 tmp.2 -rw------- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 88060 6月 24 01:04 tmp.3 -rw------- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 88060 6月 24 01:05 tmp.4 ??? redirect broken? The size 86016 of generated callback.func is used on rawhide ruby build and it is broken. Rebuilding F-16 ruby srpm for dist-f14-updates-candidate succeeds but fails for f15-candidate/dist-f16...
Comment 8 Mamoru TASAKA 2011-06-23 13:22:17 EDT
Downgrading glibc to 2.13.90-9 works. With glibc 2.14-2 build fails. Not tried other glibc yet.
Comment 9 Dan Horák 2011-06-23 17:25:30 EDT
My test on F-15 shows that last working glibc is 2.13.90-12 and 2.13.90-13 is the first broken. A dirty workaround is to use pipe and redirection with tee "| tee > file" instead of simple redirection "> file".
Comment 10 Dan Horák 2011-06-24 04:30:38 EDT
Created attachment 509696 [details] the workaround With this patch applied the build succeeds in Rawhide.
Comment 11 Vít Ondruch 2011-06-24 05:08:21 EDT
Apparently there is the same issue on Gentoo: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=370413
Comment 12 Mamoru TASAKA 2011-06-24 06:48:35 EDT
(In reply to comment #9) > My test on F-15 shows that last working glibc is 2.13.90-12 and 2.13.90-13 is > the first broken. Confirmed. 2.13.90-11: okay 2.13.90-12: okay 2.13.90-13: no good 2.13.90-14: no good 2.14-2 : no good 2.14-3 : no good Changelog of glibc 2.13.90-13 contains: - Fix a few problems in fopen and freopen ... maybe this change (which I don't know well) are causing this issue?
Comment 13 Mamoru TASAKA 2011-06-24 06:50:38 EDT
(In reply to comment #10) > Created attachment 509696 [details] > the workaround > > With this patch applied the build succeeds in Rawhide. Yes, this patch should make workaround for this, however we should ask glibc maintainer first.
Comment 14 Vít Ondruch 2011-06-24 07:17:19 EDT
Comment 15 Mamoru TASAKA 2011-07-06 11:12:05 EDT
*** Bug 719309 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 16 Mamoru TASAKA 2011-07-16 12:06:42 EDT
Comment 17 Vít Ondruch 2011-07-31 14:11:40 EDT
There was made upstream report about this glibc issue: http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/5108
Comment 18 Mamoru TASAKA 2011-08-01 03:20:08 EDT
Thank you for information. Once reopening so that we can keep track of this issue.
Comment 19 Fedora End Of Life 2013-02-13 21:31:19 EST
Fedora 16 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2013-02-12. Fedora 16 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.