Bug 717564

Summary: Provide native systemd unit file
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jóhann B. Guðmundsson <johannbg>
Component: openctAssignee: Tomas Mraz <tmraz>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: mcermak, tmraz
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: openct-0.6.20-5.fc18 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-07-27 20:19:32 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 713562    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Native systemd service file for openct
none
Minor cleanup to the service none

Description Jóhann B. Guðmundsson 2011-06-29 09:03:52 UTC
Description of problem:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson 2011-06-29 09:04:44 UTC
Created attachment 510416 [details]
Native systemd service file for openct

Comment 2 Tomas Mraz 2011-06-30 09:51:19 UTC
I am afraid that this will not be as trivial - note that the status does a different thing than usual - is it possible to achieve similar thing with systemd unit?
That is to execute arbitrary commands to get status of the service?

Comment 3 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson 2011-06-30 10:21:58 UTC
Nope not that I'm aware of ( it would have probably been ExecStatus=/$foo if it existed ).

Comment 4 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson 2011-06-30 10:22:58 UTC
Created attachment 510630 [details]
Minor cleanup to the service

Comment 5 Tomas Mraz 2012-07-27 14:15:31 UTC
*** Bug 820138 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Tomas Mraz 2012-07-27 20:19:08 UTC
I finally gave up waiting for the ExecStatus to be implemented and just left the extra status unimplemented.

Thanks for the unit file.