Bug 727562

Summary:	Missing Drools Flow
Product:	[JBoss] JBoss Enterprise BRMS Platform 5	Reporter:	Tomas Schlosser <tschloss>
Component:	Build Process	Assignee:	Julian Coleman <jcoleman>
Status:	VERIFIED ---	QA Contact:
Severity:	urgent	Docs Contact:
Priority:	urgent
Version:	BRMS 5.2.0-ER1	CC:	kverlaen, ldimaggi, mvecera, rzhang
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	BRMS 5.2.0.GA
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:	No release note content required as a this bug appears to be between internal builds only.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:		Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Tomas Schlosser 2011-08-02 13:13:45 UTC

Description of problem:
No actions related to Drools Flow are possible with BRMS 5.2. When trying to load RF (or BPMN) resource I get an exception.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. create simple RF file
2. insert it into KnowledgeBuilder
  
Actual results:
org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addProcessFromXml(PackageBuilder.java:522)
at org.drools.compiler.PackageBuilder.addKnowledgeResource(PackageBuilder.java:562)
at org.drools.builder.impl.KnowledgeBuilderImpl.add(KnowledgeBuilderImpl.java:28)
at org.jboss.qa.drools.features.ResourcesTest.getPackages(ResourcesTest.java:149)
at org.jboss.qa.drools.features.ResourcesTest.getPackages(ResourcesTest.java:143)
at org.jboss.qa.drools.features.ResourcesTest.testRF(ResourcesTest.java:76)
14 lines not shown

Comment 2 Ryan Zhang 2011-08-05 02:47:23 UTC

*** Bug 728408 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Ryan Zhang 2011-08-16 09:52:08 UTC

hi, Tomas, does this issue remain in BRMS 5.2 ER2?

As  Kris suggested, jbpm-flow and jbpm-flow-builder jars have been included in BRMS 5.2 ER2.

Comment 4 Tomas Schlosser 2011-08-17 11:52:37 UTC

Yes, the Drools flow works with BRMS-5.2.0-ER2. However only DRF format is working.

If we want to support BPMN2 format we would have to add more jBPM libraries (according to Len's comment it would be bpmn2). Note that it might bring the whole jBPM as transitive dependencies.

Comment 5 Lukáš Petrovický 2011-08-17 11:53:30 UTC

(In reply to comment #4)
> If we want to support BPMN2 format we would have to add more jBPM libraries
> (according to Len's comment it would be bpmn2). Note that it might bring the
> whole jBPM as transitive dependencies.

Since we won't be bringing in BPMN2, I'm marking this as VERIFIED.

Comment 6 lcarlon 2011-09-19 04:17:29 UTC

    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
No release note content required as a this bug appears to be between internal builds only.