Bug 729504
| Summary: | perl-Dancer: please update to version 1.3071 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jose Pedro Oliveira <jose.p.oliveira.oss> | ||||
| Component: | perl-Dancer | Assignee: | Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | mmaslano, paul, perl-devel | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2011-09-22 06:27:46 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Bug Depends On: | 704544 | ||||||
| Bug Blocks: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Jose Pedro Oliveira
2011-08-09 23:38:39 UTC
Created attachment 517506 [details]
Specfile patch: update from 1.3040 to 1.3071
Perl Dancer 1.3071 (see attached specfile patch) builds correctly in Fedora 14 and Fedora 15 with three skipped tests: * skipped: HTTP::Parser::XS is required * skipped: Dancer::Session::Cookie 0.14 required * skipped: Author tests not required for installation The EPEL6 branch will require more time as several required modules are still not present in the repositories. Modules already identified: * perl(HTTP::Server::Simple::PSGI) * perl(Plack::Builder) * perl(Devel::StackTrace) * perl(Devel::StackTrace::AsHTML) * perl(Filesys::Notify::Simple) /jpo Is perl-Devel-StackTrace not in the RHEL-6 optional channel? It was there in the 6.0 beta (perl-Devel-StackTrace-1.22-4.el6.src.rpm) and a package with that NEVR is in CentOS 6.0. (In reply to comment #3) > Is perl-Devel-StackTrace not in the RHEL-6 optional channel? It was there in > the 6.0 beta (perl-Devel-StackTrace-1.22-4.el6.src.rpm) and a package with that > NEVR is in CentOS 6.0. Paul, I forgot to mention that perl-Plack-0.9980 (using the F15 SRPM) wants Devel::StackTrace 1.23 and only version 1.22 is available in the main repositories (Argh! Major problem...). Some of the perl-Plack 0.9980 missing requirements in EPEL-6: perl(Devel::StackTrace) >= 1.23 perl(Devel::StackTrace::AsHTML) >= 0.11 perl(Filesys::Notify::Simple) perl(Test::SharedFork) perl(Hash::MultiValue) >= 0.05 perl(Test::TCP) >= 0.11 perl(Authen::Simple::Adapter) /jpo (In reply to comment #3) > Is perl-Devel-StackTrace not in the RHEL-6 optional channel? It was there in > the 6.0 beta (perl-Devel-StackTrace-1.22-4.el6.src.rpm) and a package with that > NEVR is in CentOS 6.0. I see perl-Devel-StackTrace-1.22-4.el6.noarch.rpm in optional channels for RHEL-6.1. (In reply to comment #2) > Perl Dancer 1.3071 (see attached specfile patch) builds correctly in Fedora 14 > and Fedora 15 with three skipped tests: > > * skipped: HTTP::Parser::XS is required > * skipped: Dancer::Session::Cookie 0.14 required > * skipped: Author tests not required for installation > > The EPEL6 branch will require more time as several required modules are still > not present in the repositories. Modules already identified: > > * perl(HTTP::Server::Simple::PSGI) > * perl(Plack::Builder) > * perl(Devel::StackTrace) > * perl(Devel::StackTrace::AsHTML) > * perl(Filesys::Notify::Simple) > > /jpo I'll do updates in Fedora, you can take it in EPEL if you wish. perl-Dancer-1.3071-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Dancer-1.3071-1.fc16 (In reply to comment #6) --[SNIP]-- > > I'll do updates in Fedora, you can take it in EPEL if you wish. Ok. I will start requesting EPEL-6 branches for the missing requirements and looking into the perl-Devel-StackTrace version problem. Regards, jpo First batch of requests for EPEL-6 branch creation: * Bug 575491 - perl-Test-SharedFork * Bug 664980 - perl-Test-TCP * Bug 575492 - perl-Filesys-Notify-Simple * Bug 581321 - perl-Devel-StackTrace-AsHTML * Bug 670477 - perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-PSGI * Bug 575493 - perl-Hash-MultiValue /jpo perl-Dancer-1.3071-1.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Dancer-1.3071-1.fc15 Second set of branch requests: * Bug 472167 - perl-asa * Bug 539230 - perl-Authen-Simple * Bug 664904 - perl-Authen-Simple-Passwd * Bug 575496 - perl-CGI-Compile * Bug 664815 - perl-CGI-Emulate-PSGI * Bug 581324 - perl-IO-Handle-Util * Bug 562380 - perl-FCGI-Client /jpo Hopefully the last three branch requests: * Bug 675529 - perl-Test-CheckManifest * Bug 579070 - perl-Log-Dispatch-Array * Bug 664910 - perl-Plack /jpo Forgot this one: * Bug 485642 - perl-FCGI-ProcManager /jpo The following packages have already been built for EPEL6:
Note: By default I imported a F15 SRPM; modifications stated below.
* perl-asa-0.02-8.el6
* perl-Authen-Simple-0.4-5.el6
* perl-Authen-Simple-Passwd-0.6-2.el6
* perl-CGI-Compile-0.11-4.el6
* perl-CGI-Emulate-PSGI-0.12-1.el6
* perl-FCGI-Client-0.04-5.el6.1
- added: BR perl(Time::HiRes)
* perl-FCGI-ProcManager-0.19-6.el6
* perl-Filesys-Notify-Simple-0.05-4.el6
* perl-HTTP-Server-Simple-PSGI-0.14-2.el6.1
- imported the F14 SRPM due to #705966
* perl-Hash-MultiValue-0.08-4.el6
* perl-IO-Handle-Util-0.01-3.el6
* perl-Log-Dispatch-Array-1.001-4.el6
* perl-Test-CheckManifest-1.24-1.el6
* perl-Test-SharedFork-0.16-1.el6.1
- added: BR perl(Time::HiRes)
* perl-Test-TCP-1.11-2.el6.1
- added: BR perl(Time::HiRes)
- only imported version 1.11 (instead of 1.13) due to
a Test::More version requirement
/jpo
TODO - perl-Devel-StackTrace-AsHTML, perl-Plack, and perl-Dancer
perl-Dancer-1.3071-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. perl-Dancer-1.3071-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |