Bug 729913
Summary: | man rhnplugin.conf does not containt the most up2date information | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Šimon Lukašík <slukasik> |
Component: | yum-rhn-plugin | Assignee: | Matej Kollar <mkollar> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Pavel Studeník <pstudeni> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 6.1 | CC: | cperry, dyordano, jchaloup, mmraka, pschiffe, pstudeni, slukasik |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | ManPageChange |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | yum-rhn-plugin-0.9.1-53 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-07-22 07:25:01 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Šimon Lukašík
2011-08-11 09:09:03 UTC
Since RHEL 6.2 External Beta has begun, and this bug remains unresolved, it has been rejected as it is not proposed as exception or blocker. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. It seems to me that all options available in `man rhnplugin.conf` are those that are described in `man yum.conf`. Maybe only change is that section names are labels of channels on RHN/Satellite/Spacewalk server. So whole man page can be dropped maybe except * mentioning man of yum.conf * and semantics for section names. * semantics of `enabled` in `[main]` section though that one is kind of obvious... Mentioned setting `priority=` is available only when `priority` yum plugin is available and thus is configuration of that plugin (even though it has an impact on our plugin), so our man page is certainly not the right place explain its semantics. Would it be OK to proceed this way? I see no problem. Upstream work Spacewalk.git: * 3fdde89785f7613f2872b87b23844889d4b77030 * 8624da7d1c8ee65205271d30e58b9bc405ec2cb3 Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1390.html |