Bug 730165
Summary: | [abrt] mutt-1.5.21-6.fc15: rfc822_cpy_adr: Process /usr/bin/mutt was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Paul W. Frields <stickster> |
Component: | mutt | Assignee: | Honza Horak <hhorak> |
Status: | CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 15 | CC: | hhorak, mlichvar, pertusus |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | abrt_hash:781bfff30911f4b034e493a7379db50d72ba218d | ||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-06-07 09:17:26 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Paul W. Frields
2011-08-12 00:59:36 UTC
Sorry for the delayed answer. I cannot understand, how the process could fault in this place. If we have 0x0 in addr, then cycle "for (; addr; addr = addr->next)" wouldn't be executed at all and shouldn't crash. Or do I miss something. So it seems like a random crash, which can be caused by some memory error or so. Have you encounter this fault only once or is it reproducible? |