|Summary:||Missing gzip_stream.h in protobuf-devel|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Sébastien Willmann <sebastien.willmann>|
|Status:||CLOSED ERRATA||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||15||CC:||cse.cem+redhatbugz, derks, pingou, shamardin|
|Fixed In Version:||protobuf-2.4.1-2.fc16||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2011-10-08 17:59:06 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description Sébastien Willmann 2011-08-19 18:15:18 UTC
Description of problem: The file gzip_stream.h is not in the package protobuf-devel. I think it misses zlib as a BuildRequire. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.3.0-7
Comment 1 Pierre-YvesChibon 2011-09-06 13:52:12 UTC
ping ? This blocks the review for a new package...
Comment 2 Conrad Meyer 2011-09-06 17:08:01 UTC
(In reply to comment #0) > Description of problem: > The file gzip_stream.h is not in the package protobuf-devel. I think it misses > zlib as a BuildRequire. > > Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.3.0-7 First: Sorry, I've been busy and then offline (moving) and won't have regular internet capabilities until at least Thursday. I'm confused why this is broken now. zlib is a dependency of gcc, which falls under http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Exceptions_2 ; zlib-devel doesn't include a gzip_stream.h header. In fact, nothing seems to include a gzip_stream header: $ repoquery -qf /usr/include/gzip_stream.h No package provides /usr/include/gzip_stream.h
Comment 3 Sébastien Willmann 2011-09-06 20:39:52 UTC
The problem is not that protobuf-devel requires this file, but that it should provide it. See http://code.google.com/intl/fr/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/reference/cpp/google.protobuf.io.gzip_stream.html Of course, the missing BuildRequire is zlib-devel and not zlib as I said. Sorry if the description was not clear enough.
Comment 4 Pierre-YvesChibon 2011-09-15 11:01:56 UTC
So what do we do ?
Comment 5 Sébastien Willmann 2011-09-15 20:48:03 UTC
I built the package with mock adding zlib-devel as a BR, and gzip_stream.h appeared in protobuf-devel. So I confirm that zlib-devel should be added as a BR.
Comment 6 Pierre-YvesChibon 2011-09-25 18:38:36 UTC
Since the only change needed is a rebuild with the new BR and I have provenpackager rights. Would you like me to take care of the rebuild ?
Comment 7 Conrad Meyer 2011-09-26 22:57:35 UTC
(In reply to comment #6) > Since the only change needed is a rebuild with the new BR and I have > provenpackager rights. Would you like me to take care of the rebuild ? Yes, please. (Sorry, very busy lately...)
Comment 8 Pierre-YvesChibon 2011-09-27 19:21:25 UTC
Thanks, will do :)
Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2011-09-28 08:11:14 UTC
protobuf-2.3.0-8.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/protobuf-2.3.0-8.fc15
Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2011-09-28 08:11:36 UTC
protobuf-2.4.1-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/protobuf-2.4.1-2.fc16
Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2011-09-28 18:50:08 UTC
Package protobuf-2.4.1-2.fc16: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing protobuf-2.4.1-2.fc16' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/protobuf-2.4.1-2.fc16 then log in and leave karma (feedback).
Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2011-10-08 17:59:06 UTC
protobuf-2.3.0-8.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2011-10-09 19:42:38 UTC
protobuf-2.4.1-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.