Bug 732232 (ledgersmb)

Summary:	Review Request: ledgersmb - Financial accounting program
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <sanjay.ankur>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	mads, notting, package-review, rpandit
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-10-15 05:00:40 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) 2011-08-21 07:11:43 UTC

Spec URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/ledgersmb/ledgersmb.spec
SRPM URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/ledgersmb/ledgersmb-1.2.24-1.fc15.src.rpm

Description: 
LedgerSMB is a double-entry accounting system written in perl.
LedgerSMB is a fork of sql-ledger offering better security and data integrity,
and many advanced features.

This package does not work in SELinux restricted mode.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment 1 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) 2011-08-21 07:13:01 UTC

*** Bug 604005 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Mads Kiilerich 2011-08-21 20:02:35 UTC

I contributed dists/rpm/ledgersmb.spec upstream a couple of years ago. It would be nice if you could reuse some parts or contribute a better spec upstream.

(I concluded back then that getting a system up and running was so messy and required so much manual work no matter what that there wasn't any benefit from having an 1.x RPM in Fedora. 2.0 should be much better, but it seems like the project has stalled ...)

(That it doesn't work with SELinux is IMHO not a SELinux bug but an indication that the inherited code-base is insecure by design.)

Comment 3 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) 2011-08-25 14:05:36 UTC

(In reply to comment #2)
> I contributed dists/rpm/ledgersmb.spec upstream a couple of years ago. It would
> be nice if you could reuse some parts or contribute a better spec upstream.
> 
> (I concluded back then that getting a system up and running was so messy and
> required so much manual work no matter what that there wasn't any benefit from
> having an 1.x RPM in Fedora. 2.0 should be much better, but it seems like the
> project has stalled ...)
> 
> (That it doesn't work with SELinux is IMHO not a SELinux bug but an indication
> that the inherited code-base is insecure by design.)

Hello Mads,

I referred Rakesh's spec from the older review ticket (#604005). I think he referred yours since the build section etc look similar. :)

Thanks, 
Ankur

Comment 4 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) 2011-10-15 05:00:40 UTC

Hi,

I'm not working on -medical related packages anymore and will not be pursuing this review ticket. If someone else wishes to take up the review, please open a new ticket. 

Thanks,
Ankur