Bug 733789
Summary: | Issue building el6 packages on el5 (CentOS 5.6) server | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jim Goddard <monkeys.typing> |
Component: | mock | Assignee: | Clark Williams <williams> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 16 | CC: | mebrown, williams, yury |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-09-23 18:16:25 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Jim Goddard
2011-08-26 21:15:23 UTC
I think this bug against mock should be closed as invalid / wontfix, because this issue does not relate directly to mock and not something that can be fixed within mock. If you want to build RHEL6 packages on a RHEL5 system, you need to install a patched version of rpm from Fedora Infrastructure repositories that supports XZ payloads and SHA hashes (at least until this functionality is officially implemented in RHEL5, which may or may not happen, open a support request with RH if you think that it's an important issue). See the following bugs for reference: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490613 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620674 Z. (In reply to comment #1) > I think this bug against mock should be closed as invalid / wontfix, because > this issue does not relate directly to mock and not something that can be fixed > within mock. > > If you want to build RHEL6 packages on a RHEL5 system, you need to install a > patched version of rpm from Fedora Infrastructure repositories that supports XZ > payloads and SHA hashes (at least until this functionality is officially > implemented in RHEL5, which may or may not happen, open a support request with > RH if you think that it's an important issue). > > See the following bugs for reference: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490613 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620674 > > Z. Agreed, this is not something we can address via mock. |