Bug 737294

Summary:	Review Request: <Virtual Moon Atlas> - <Astronomical Moon Atlas>
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Richard Carlson <carlsonrichard>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	rawhide	CC:	mario.blaettermann, notting, package-review, susi.lehtola
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-09-12 09:07:55 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Richard Carlson 2011-09-10 19:23:26 UTC

Spec URL: <http://ap-i.net/avl/en/start>
SRPM URL: <srpm info here>

description here>This software, realized by Patrick Chevalley and Christian Legrand can visualize the Moon aspect for every date and hour and pilot computerized telescopes on the Moon surface. It permits also to study lunar formations with unique database of more than 9000 entries and a more than 7000 pictures library compiled by Christian Legrand.

Comment 1 Mario Blättermann 2011-09-10 22:31:58 UTC

If you really want to provide a package for review, you should build a package first and provide links to the spec file and source rpm.

Seems to be that you are just interested in to see this software packaged in Fedora, because your link points to a project website. This review request tracker is only intended to be a pool for already packaged software, which needs to be reviewed by other packagers, in order to integrate it in the official package database. See the wiki pages [1] and the packaging guidelines [2] for more information.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Package_Maintainers
[2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines

Comment 2 Susi Lehtola 2011-09-12 09:07:55 UTC

Closing until this becomes a proper review bug.