Bug 74170
Summary: | XFS filesystem missing in RH kernel | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Public Beta | Reporter: | Simon Matter <simon.matter> |
Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Arjan van de Ven <arjanv> |
Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | Brian Brock <bbrock> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | null | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2002-09-17 08:43:17 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Simon Matter
2002-09-17 08:43:11 UTC
I think you are misinformed; the XFS filesystem is not yet in any Linus released 2.5 kernel Fortunately, Linus has merged XFS into his BitKeeper tree; it will thus show up in 2.5.36 :) http://lwn.net/Articles/9998/ Here we're also waiting for RedHat to include XFS support in their distributions. As for now, we cannot upgrade... Does RedHat think that XFS competes with ext3? Kind regards Note that we really want to move to RedHat 8.0 but will need to spend a lot of effort in doing so as all of our major systems are running XFS as the filesystem. I wonder why RedHat does not support XFS. Most other distributions already do support it. RedHat included ext3 before it was part of the kernel source tree, so this is not a request that goes against policy (unless that was against policy). XFS has proven itself to us due to its ability to handle large numbers of files in a filesystem and the performance of that filesystem. The imap server runs significantly better with XFS than ext3 or ext2 (or BSD UFS - one of the reasons we are moving to Linux is XFS). In fact, in addition to the performance being as good as it is, XFS did not suffer from i-node limitations that we get in all of the other filesystems we tried. Plus the ability to recover from a unexpected crash/reboot has proven to be very robust in our test labs. XFS used to be a support nightmare (until VERY VERY recently when Linus merged it into 2.5) EXT3 did not form such a nightmare since the on-disk format is compatible with ext2, eg it didn't introduce on-disk layout incompatibilities with Linus' kernel. |