Bug 742935

Summary: Review Request: rubygem-metaclass - Adds a metaclass method to all Ruby objects
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Vít Ondruch <vondruch>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda <bkabrda>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: bkabrda, notting, package-review, tdawson
Target Milestone: ---Flags: bkabrda: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-10-04 13:06:08 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 742904, 743007    

Comment 1 Vít Ondruch 2011-10-03 12:36:50 UTC
Please note that it is not clear under what license this project was released, but I expect it is under the same terms as rubygem-mocha. Please see [1] for more information.

[1] https://github.com/floehopper/metaclass/issues/1

Comment 2 Vít Ondruch 2011-10-04 06:10:06 UTC
The license is MIT as clarified by upstream, so I'll update the spec file in a second.

Comment 3 Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda 2011-10-04 06:43:47 UTC
I'm taking this one.

Comment 5 Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda 2011-10-04 07:05:17 UTC
* I would consider including the license file from upstream (as a separate source) and including it as a %doc.
* %{geminstdir}/README.md should be marked as %doc.

Comment 6 Vít Ondruch 2011-10-04 07:52:02 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> * I would consider including the license file from upstream (as a separate
> source) and including it as a %doc.

I'll include the license file as soon as it makes into official release. It is not hard requirement, so it should not be blocker.

> * %{geminstdir}/README.md should be marked as %doc.

Moved into -doc subpackage and marked as %doc.


Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-metaclass.spec
SRPM URL:
http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-metaclass-0.0.1-3.fcf17.src.rpm

Comment 7 Vít Ondruch 2011-10-04 07:55:37 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > * I would consider including the license file from upstream (as a separate
> > source) and including it as a %doc.
> 
> I'll include the license file as soon as it makes into official release. It is
> not hard requirement, so it should not be blocker.

I added also the reference to the GitHub issue into the .spec file.

Comment 8 Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda 2011-10-04 09:40:04 UTC
APPROVED

Comment 9 Vít Ondruch 2011-10-04 10:24:58 UTC
Thank you for your review!




New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: rubygem-metaclass
Short Description: Adds a metaclass method to all Ruby objects
Owners: vondruch
Branches: 
InitialCC:

Comment 10 Gwyn Ciesla 2011-10-04 12:21:26 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).

Comment 11 Troy Dawson 2014-07-28 18:52:43 UTC
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: rubygem-metaclass
New Branches: epel7
Owners: tdawson

Comment 12 Gwyn Ciesla 2014-07-28 19:16:16 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).