Bug 742935
Summary: | Review Request: rubygem-metaclass - Adds a metaclass method to all Ruby objects | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Vít Ondruch <vondruch> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda <bkabrda> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | bkabrda, notting, package-review, tdawson |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | bkabrda:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2011-10-04 13:06:08 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 742904, 743007 |
Description
Vít Ondruch
2011-10-03 12:33:35 UTC
Please note that it is not clear under what license this project was released, but I expect it is under the same terms as rubygem-mocha. Please see [1] for more information. [1] https://github.com/floehopper/metaclass/issues/1 The license is MIT as clarified by upstream, so I'll update the spec file in a second. I'm taking this one. Spec with updated license: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-metaclass.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-metaclass-0.0.1-2.fcf17.src.rpm * I would consider including the license file from upstream (as a separate source) and including it as a %doc. * %{geminstdir}/README.md should be marked as %doc. (In reply to comment #5) > * I would consider including the license file from upstream (as a separate > source) and including it as a %doc. I'll include the license file as soon as it makes into official release. It is not hard requirement, so it should not be blocker. > * %{geminstdir}/README.md should be marked as %doc. Moved into -doc subpackage and marked as %doc. Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-metaclass.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-metaclass-0.0.1-3.fcf17.src.rpm (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > * I would consider including the license file from upstream (as a separate > > source) and including it as a %doc. > > I'll include the license file as soon as it makes into official release. It is > not hard requirement, so it should not be blocker. I added also the reference to the GitHub issue into the .spec file. APPROVED Thank you for your review! New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-metaclass Short Description: Adds a metaclass method to all Ruby objects Owners: vondruch Branches: InitialCC: Git done (by process-git-requests). Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: rubygem-metaclass New Branches: epel7 Owners: tdawson Git done (by process-git-requests). |