Bug 74443

Summary:	Libtiff depends broken
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Linux	Reporter:	Daniel Powell <djpowell>
Component:	libtiff	Assignee:	Matthias Clasen <mclasen>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	8.0
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i386
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2004-05-19 19:19:34 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Daniel Powell 2002-09-24 14:36:11 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1)

Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install libtiff
2. Try and install cups-libs
3. Cups libs requires libtiff.so.3
4. trying to determine which package provides i ran across a missing provides 
listing.

	

Actual Results:  cup-libs says it needs libtiff.so.3

[djpowell@Hydrometer djpowell]$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/libtiff.so.3
file /usr/lib/libtiff.so.3 is not owned by any package

[djpowell@Hydrometer djpowell]$ rpm -qf /usr/lib/libtiff.so.3.5
libtiff-3.5.7-6



Expected Results:  [djpowell@Hydrometer djpowell]$ rpm -
qf /usr/lib/libtiff.so.3.5
libtiff-3.5.7-6

libtiff.so.3 should resolve to the same package.

Additional info:

I dont know that this really affects the installation but i was trying to find 
what provided libtiff so i could install it on another system in order to get 
samba installed , samba requires libcups which requires libtiff. Libtiff was 
on another machine and i ran rpm -qf /usr/lib/libtiff.so.3 ... results as 
above. Should the provides list this file? even though libtiff.so.3 is a 
symlink.. it still seems as a normal file to the system and binareis linked 
against it.

Comment 1 Daniel Powell 2002-10-02 16:57:07 UTC

It may not be the depends per se, but rather that the RPM does not claim all 
the files.

Comment 2 Phil Knirsch 2002-10-04 15:05:04 UTC

I'll have to check the specfile and the depends stuff in there, maybe something
is wrong.

Read ya, Phil