Bug 747375

Summary: multiple occurrence of "+|-e" parameter is ignored
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Branislav Náter <bnater>
Component: lsofAssignee: Peter Schiffer <pschiffe>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: BaseOS QE - Apps <qe-baseos-apps>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6.2CC: ovasik
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-04-03 15:21:09 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Branislav Náter 2011-10-19 16:09:02 UTC
Description of problem:
It should be possible to call lsof with +|-e parameter to exclude kernel function calls (stat(), lstat(), readlink()) for particular filesystems. Multiple occurrence of this parameter is ignored.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
lsof-4.82-2.el6

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
two mounted filesystems are required (e.g. /boot, /home)
1. cd /boot
2. lsof -e /boot | grep /boot
3. lsof -e /home -e /boot | grep /boot
  
Actual results:
step 2.:
bash      2125      root  cwd   UNKNcwd            UNKNOWN                     /boot (-e /boot)
lsof      2551      root  cwd   UNKNcwd            UNKNOWN                     /boot (-e /boot)
grep      2552      root  cwd   UNKNcwd            UNKNOWN                     /boot (-e /boot)
lsof      2553      root  cwd   UNKNcwd            UNKNOWN                     /boot (-e /boot)

step 3.:
bash      2125      root  cwd       DIR                8,1     1024          2 /boot
lsof      2554      root  cwd       DIR                8,1     1024          2 /boot
grep      2555      root  cwd       DIR                8,1     1024          2 /boot
lsof      2556      root  cwd       DIR                8,1     1024          2 /boot

Expected results:
output from step 2. and 3. should be the same

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2012-04-03 15:21:09 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0442.html