Bug 747939

Summary: bodhi -r dist-f14 -b 676195 don't respect -r option
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Nikola Pajkovsky <npajkovs>
Component: bodhiAssignee: Luke Macken <lmacken>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: urgent Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 16CC: a.badger, dhoward, jmoskovc, lmacken, pfrields, rvokal, tla
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-10-24 20:18:13 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Nikola Pajkovsky 2011-10-21 13:03:41 UTC
Description of problem:
bodhi client or better bodhi server returns wrong answer. When you try to ask for bodhi server: "give me all builds which fix bug XYZ for fedora 14" it w/o any problems returns build for f15 (any builds which fix the bug).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:
$ bodhi -r dist-f14 -b 676195
Actual results:
$ bodhi -r dist-f14 -b 676195
 griffith-0.12.1-2.fc14                       enhancement  stable    2011-03-23 
 griffith-0.12.1-2.fc15                       enhancement  stable    2011-03-24 

Expected results:
$ bodhi -r dist-f14 -b 676195
 griffith-0.12.1-2.fc14                       enhancement  stable    2011-03-23 

Additional info:
I will write a workaround to filter out wrongly returned builds, but it's problem on the server side.

I'm putting bug as *urgent*, because I'm trying to put it into abrt/libreport to be able find builds before abrt tries to creates new ticket in bugzilla

Comment 1 Luke Macken 2011-10-21 18:31:40 UTC
On it...

Comment 2 Luke Macken 2011-10-21 19:01:27 UTC
I got `bodhi -r <release> -b <bug>` queries working in:


Also, bodhi never supported querying releases by their dist-tags, like your example shows, so I added it in:


I'll try and deploy this to production today.

Comment 3 Nikola Pajkovsky 2011-10-24 09:27:36 UTC
thanks for nice and quick job!

Comment 4 Luke Macken 2011-10-24 20:18:13 UTC
These patches are now in production!

Comment 5 Nikola Pajkovsky 2011-10-25 09:12:40 UTC
and works like charm, thanks

Comment 6 Luke Macken 2012-07-20 18:19:14 UTC
This particular ServerError has been fixed in the bodhi-server for quite some time now. I also just verified that fedora-easy-karma works as expected on RHEL5.