Bug 74906

Summary:	Red Hat artwork sucks in Qt - why
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Linux	Reporter:	Alan Cox <alan>
Component:	qt	Assignee:	Than Ngo <than>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	8.0
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i386
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2002-12-13 12:27:52 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Alan Cox 2002-10-02 18:44:26 UTC

Why does Red Hat artwork have a dependancy on qt - its the only thing sucking Qt
into a fairly minimal desktop install ?

Comment 1 Havoc Pennington 2002-10-02 19:47:51 UTC

Otherwise /usr/lib/qt3 would be created as a dir, and it needs to be a symlink.
Only way I know how to fix this is to get rid of that symlink in the qt package
and just always install qt to /usr/lib/qt3 directly.

Comment 2 Ngo Than 2002-12-13 12:27:52 UTC

It's fixed in qt-3.1.0-1 and redhat-artwork-0.49-3