Bug 74906 - Red Hat artwork sucks in Qt - why
Summary: Red Hat artwork sucks in Qt - why
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: qt   
(Show other bugs)
Version: 8.0
Hardware: i386 Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ngo Than
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2002-10-02 18:44 UTC by Alan Cox
Modified: 2008-05-01 15:38 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-12-13 12:27:52 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Alan Cox 2002-10-02 18:44:26 UTC
Why does Red Hat artwork have a dependancy on qt - its the only thing sucking Qt
into a fairly minimal desktop install ?

Comment 1 Havoc Pennington 2002-10-02 19:47:51 UTC
Otherwise /usr/lib/qt3 would be created as a dir, and it needs to be a symlink.
Only way I know how to fix this is to get rid of that symlink in the qt package
and just always install qt to /usr/lib/qt3 directly.

Comment 2 Ngo Than 2002-12-13 12:27:52 UTC
It's fixed in qt-3.1.0-1 and redhat-artwork-0.49-3


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.