Bug 74906 - Red Hat artwork sucks in Qt - why
Summary: Red Hat artwork sucks in Qt - why
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: qt
Version: 8.0
Hardware: i386
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Than Ngo
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2002-10-02 18:44 UTC by Alan Cox
Modified: 2008-05-01 15:38 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-12-13 12:27:52 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Alan Cox 2002-10-02 18:44:26 UTC 
Why does Red Hat artwork have a dependancy on qt - its the only thing sucking Qt
into a fairly minimal desktop install ?
Comment 1 Havoc Pennington 2002-10-02 19:47:51 UTC 
Otherwise /usr/lib/qt3 would be created as a dir, and it needs to be a symlink.
Only way I know how to fix this is to get rid of that symlink in the qt package
and just always install qt to /usr/lib/qt3 directly.
Comment 2 Ngo Than 2002-12-13 12:27:52 UTC 
It's fixed in qt-3.1.0-1 and redhat-artwork-0.49-3
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.