Bug 756531
| Summary: | rpmbuild needs option to skip '%clean' phase | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Philip Prindeville <philipp> |
| Component: | rpm | Assignee: | Panu Matilainen <pmatilai> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 16 | CC: | a.badger, ffesti, jnovy, pmatilai |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Upstream |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-10-15 11:34:26 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Philip Prindeville
2011-11-23 20:44:01 UTC
Reassigned to rpm which is where rpm-build is built from. However, is there a reason that something like rpmbuild -bi is not sufficient for you? (In reply to comment #1) > Reassigned to rpm which is where rpm-build is built from. However, is there a > reason that something like rpmbuild -bi is not sufficient for you? Because we'd also want the -bb phase done (the actual binary packaging). There's a --clean option... why not a --noclean option? Implemented upstream now. rpm >= 4.10.1 in rawhide and F18 supports --noclean (and --nocheck). I've no plans to backport anything new to 4.9.x though, so closing. |