Bug 763436 (GLUSTER-1704)

Summary: showmount works after some time interval.
Product: [Community] GlusterFS Reporter: Lakshmipathi G <lakshmipathi>
Component: nfsAssignee: Shehjar Tikoo <shehjart>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact:
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 3.1-alphaCC: gluster-bugs, saurabh
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: RTP Mount Type: nfs
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Lakshmipathi G 2010-09-25 06:31:57 UTC 
nfs started ,after some time(few seconds ) on brick where "volume start" command is issued.


10.192.134.144#gluster volume start beta
Starting volume beta has been successful
10.192.134.144#showmount -e localhost
showmount: RPC: Program not registered
10.192.134.144#showmount -e localhost
showmount: RPC: Program not registered
10.192.134.144#showmount -e localhost
showmount: RPC: Program not registered
10.192.134.144#showmount -e localhost
Export list for localhost:
/beta *
Comment 1 Shehjar Tikoo 2010-09-25 07:19:11 UTC 
This is expected behaviour from 3.1beta. For a distributed config, NFS will now wait till all bricks have connected before making them visible to nfs clients. I agree there is some confusion here whether the gnfs init failed or whether the bricks have not connected yet. I'll see if this can be made more definite.
Comment 2 Shehjar Tikoo 2010-10-05 08:52:27 UTC 
This behaviour will change now because distribute supports doing a fresh lookup by itself. Changing to 3.1.1. Only requires removing code and I want to do this carefully.
Comment 3 Shehjar Tikoo 2010-10-26 08:54:02 UTC 
Not relevant anymore since nfs init does not block on all child-ups from dht.
Comment 4 Saurabh 2011-02-17 06:31:34 UTC 
Does this bug needs verfication from QA side?

If yes,

 Does the steps mentioned to introduce this bug are enough, else please provide test plan.
Comment 5 Shehjar Tikoo 2011-02-17 06:32:31 UTC 
(In reply to comment #4)
> Does this bug needs verfication from QA side?
> 
> If yes,
> 
>  Does the steps mentioned to introduce this bug are enough, else please provide
> test plan.

No. It does not neet verification.