Bug 763436 (GLUSTER-1704) - showmount works after some time interval.
Summary: showmount works after some time interval.
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: GLUSTER-1704
Product: GlusterFS
Classification: Community
Component: nfs
Version: 3.1-alpha
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Shehjar Tikoo
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-09-25 06:31 UTC by Lakshmipathi G
Modified: 2015-12-01 16:45 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Regression: RTP
Mount Type: nfs
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Lakshmipathi G 2010-09-25 06:31:57 UTC
nfs started ,after some time(few seconds ) on brick where "volume start" command is issued.


10.192.134.144#gluster volume start beta
Starting volume beta has been successful
10.192.134.144#showmount -e localhost
showmount: RPC: Program not registered
10.192.134.144#showmount -e localhost
showmount: RPC: Program not registered
10.192.134.144#showmount -e localhost
showmount: RPC: Program not registered
10.192.134.144#showmount -e localhost
Export list for localhost:
/beta *

Comment 1 Shehjar Tikoo 2010-09-25 07:19:11 UTC
This is expected behaviour from 3.1beta. For a distributed config, NFS will now wait till all bricks have connected before making them visible to nfs clients. I agree there is some confusion here whether the gnfs init failed or whether the bricks have not connected yet. I'll see if this can be made more definite.

Comment 2 Shehjar Tikoo 2010-10-05 08:52:27 UTC
This behaviour will change now because distribute supports doing a fresh lookup by itself. Changing to 3.1.1. Only requires removing code and I want to do this carefully.

Comment 3 Shehjar Tikoo 2010-10-26 08:54:02 UTC
Not relevant anymore since nfs init does not block on all child-ups from dht.

Comment 4 Saurabh 2011-02-17 06:31:34 UTC
Does this bug needs verfication from QA side?

If yes,

 Does the steps mentioned to introduce this bug are enough, else please provide test plan.

Comment 5 Shehjar Tikoo 2011-02-17 06:32:31 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> Does this bug needs verfication from QA side?
> 
> If yes,
> 
>  Does the steps mentioned to introduce this bug are enough, else please provide
> test plan.

No. It does not neet verification.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.