Bug 772977

Summary: Anaconda tries to use read-only DASD drive for installation
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Jan Stodola <jstodola>
Component: anacondaAssignee: David Cantrell <dcantrell>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Release Test Team <release-test-team-automation>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 6.2CC: dcantrell, jreed
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: s390x   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: anaconda-13.21.177-1 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
No documentation needed.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-21 09:58:32 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 760559, 840685    

Description Jan Stodola 2012-01-10 15:23:28 UTC
Description of problem:
When installation is stared with something like:

DASD='3527,3627(ro)'

in CMS config file, anaconda allows to use both 3527 and 3627 for partitioning. This results in a traceback when writing changes to disks:


anaconda 13.21.149 exception report
Traceback (most recent call first):
  File "/usr/lib/anaconda/storage/devicelibs/lvm.py", line 188, in pvcreate
    raise LVMError("pvcreate failed for %s: %s" % (device, msg))
  File "/usr/lib/anaconda/storage/formats/lvmpv.py", line 117, in create
    lvm.pvcreate(self.device, progress=w)
  File "/usr/lib/anaconda/storage/deviceaction.py", line 290, in execute
    options=self.device.formatArgs)
  File "/usr/lib/anaconda/storage/devicetree.py", line 713, in processActions
    action.execute(intf=self.intf)
  File "/usr/lib/anaconda/storage/__init__.py", line 344, in doIt
    self.devicetree.processActions()
  File "/usr/lib/anaconda/packages.py", line 110, in turnOnFilesystems
    anaconda.id.storage.doIt()
  File "/usr/lib/anaconda/dispatch.py", line 208, in moveStep
    rc = stepFunc(self.anaconda)
  File "/usr/lib/anaconda/dispatch.py", line 126, in gotoNext
    self.moveStep()
  File "/usr/lib/anaconda/gui.py", line 1390, in nextClicked
    self.anaconda.dispatch.gotoNext()
LVMError: pvcreate failed for /dev/dasdc1: 10:03:17,549 ERROR   :   Can't open /dev/dasdc1 exclusively.  Mounted filesystem?


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHEL-6.2
anaconda-13.21.149-1.el6

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. modify CMS config file, add '(ro)' to any DASD device
2. start the installation
3. select all available DASD devices
4. let anaconda to create auto-partitionig
  
Actual results:
Traceback when writing partitioning to disks

Expected results:
User should not be allowed to partition read-only DASD drives during the installation

Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2012-05-03 05:01:06 UTC
Since RHEL 6.3 External Beta has begun, and this bug remains
unresolved, it has been rejected as it is not proposed as
exception or blocker.

Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if appropriate and relevant, in the
next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 4 David Cantrell 2012-05-11 19:43:52 UTC
*** Bug 820022 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Jesse Keating 2012-06-28 20:07:07 UTC
This has been fixed upstream and a patch is available for RHEL6.

Comment 7 RHEL Program Management 2012-07-16 22:46:12 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release.  Product
Management has requested further review of this request by
Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat
Enterprise Linux release for currently deployed products.
This request is not yet committed for inclusion in a release.

Comment 9 Jan Stodola 2012-12-11 12:04:25 UTC
Verified using compose RHEL6.4-20121206.0 with anaconda-13.21.187-1.el6.
Installation finished successfully, anaconda didn't allow to use read-only DASD drive for installation.

Moving to VERIFIED.

Comment 11 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-21 09:58:32 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0373.html