Bug 77305
| Summary: | Kernel 2.4.18-17.7.xsmp pivotroot failed | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | ipvcor |
| Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Arjan van de Ven <arjanv> |
| Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Brian Brock <bbrock> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 7.3 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | i686 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2002-11-05 09:29:51 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
ipvcor
2002-11-04 23:20:51 UTC
uhhh.... this is weird... issued 'rpm -ivh kernel-smp-2.4.18-17.7.x.i686.rpm' and it installed without complaining that the rpm was already installed... ???? check this out: # rpm -q kernel-smp kernel-smp-2.4.18-10 kernel-smp-2.4.18-17.7.x kernel-smp-2.4.18-17.7.x kernel-smp-2.4.18-17.7.x wtf??? hummm... this is funky. rpm -e --allmatches kernel-smp-2.4.18-17.7.x will remove all of them and then install only 1. Once that doesn't work please check the boot log to see if there's ANY sign of scsi driver activity.. removed all instances of -17.xsmp and reinstalled. booted without a problem! weird... out of curiosity, the first time i installed -17.xsmp, i was running a homemade kernel with the scsi driver built statically in the kernel (2.4.19). would this by chance have any effect on the installation of the errata kernel? am thinking that since the scsi driver was commented out in /etc/modules.conf while i was running my own kernel, that the install process for the errata kernel somehow 'skipped' the scsi driver (it was uncommented in my previous attempts to boot the errata kernel). does this sound reasonable or should i just leave well-enough alone? ;) thanks again for your help! |