Bug 77312
Summary: | Web find function fails when selecting detail about a component | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Need Real Name <mike.zachry> |
Component: | gnorpm | Assignee: | Havoc Pennington <hp> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 7.2 | CC: | hp |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2003-01-12 21:01:49 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Need Real Name
2002-11-04 23:59:53 UTC
Moving to web site product as apparently it's a web site missing-RDF issue. If it's a gnorpm issue, gnorpm is no longer actively developed; in 8.0 the replacement is redhat-config-packages. Actually, this looks like an rpm2html issue. The rdf's are there, but are malformed. Take a look at http://www.redhat.com/RDF/resources/zsh.rdf for a small-ish example of what's wrong. I'll try to catch up with Daniel and see if we can figure out what's going on there. I just fetched the zsh.rdf , apparently it's well formed XML, so what's the problem ? paphio:~ -> xmllint --noout zsh.rdf paphio:~ -> Daniel OK, this was apparently a mozilla rendering bug that led me to believe that the RDF was malformed. After talking to Daniel for a bit, this looks like a gnorpm issue (again). I did a little more checking into this, and found that there is an additional error message displayed by gnorpm: Was not expecting a rdf:Description element I added another variable to find out what it was indeed looking for, and got this: Was not expecting a rdf:Description element, expected RDF:Description So it looks like gnorpm is at fault here, because according to Daniel, the prefix should not matter, just the namespace mapping to the prefix is important. So if it's gnorpm, gnorpm is not being actively fixed and isn't there in newer releases. |