Bug 773743

Summary: Promotions - WebUI not uniquifying errata in list view
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Corey Welton <cwelton>
Component: WebUIAssignee: Eric Helms <ehelms>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Katello QA List <katello-qa-list>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.0.1CC: ehelms, mmccune
Target Milestone: UnspecifiedKeywords: Triaged
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-08-22 18:19:13 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 747354    
Attachments:
Description Flags
screenshot none

Description Corey Welton 2012-01-12 18:39:40 UTC 
Description of problem:
If, for whatever reason, multiple content sources contain the same errata, the errata shows up multiple times in the Promotions > Errata view

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.  Add RH provider; sync 6.1 standard and optional content 
2.  Promotions > Errata > All
3.  Look down the list; you'll probably readily see the dupes, but if not, click around until multiple lines end up highlighted.
  
Actual results:
We're gettind duplicate results, presumably because the same errata is used by multiple content sources

Expected results:
Uniquify the errata list

Additional info:
This also provides some evidence that we're not sorting these in some sort of predictable order, but not too concerned there, right now.
Comment 1 Corey Welton 2012-01-12 18:40:27 UTC 
Created attachment 552461 [details]
screenshot
Comment 3 Mike McCune 2012-01-20 01:21:10 UTC 
Need to rework how we show errata since the current way really isn't that usable. Errata can exist across version boundaries very easily.

For example, *every* errata that goes into RHEL 6.1Z stream will also end up in base RHEL6.
Comment 4 Eric Helms 2012-02-10 17:23:54 UTC 
b4c296f83c307cf144eede7b08ec36287140ba61

This is part of a larger set of work done to add errata search to promotions.  This in turn should provide unique errata listings.
Comment 5 Corey Welton 2012-02-17 21:32:16 UTC 
QA Verified.
Comment 7 Mike McCune 2013-08-16 18:02:00 UTC 
getting rid of 6.0.0 version since that doesn't exist