Bug 773743 - Promotions - WebUI not uniquifying errata in list view
Summary: Promotions - WebUI not uniquifying errata in list view
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Satellite
Classification: Red Hat
Component: WebUI
Version: 6.0.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium vote
Target Milestone: Unspecified
Assignee: Eric Helms
QA Contact: Katello QA List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: katello-blockers
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-01-12 18:39 UTC by Corey Welton
Modified: 2019-09-26 13:28 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-08-22 18:19:13 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
screenshot (60.61 KB, image/png)
2012-01-12 18:40 UTC, Corey Welton
no flags Details

Description Corey Welton 2012-01-12 18:39:40 UTC
Description of problem:
If, for whatever reason, multiple content sources contain the same errata, the errata shows up multiple times in the Promotions > Errata view

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.  Add RH provider; sync 6.1 standard and optional content 
2.  Promotions > Errata > All
3.  Look down the list; you'll probably readily see the dupes, but if not, click around until multiple lines end up highlighted.
  
Actual results:
We're gettind duplicate results, presumably because the same errata is used by multiple content sources

Expected results:
Uniquify the errata list

Additional info:
This also provides some evidence that we're not sorting these in some sort of predictable order, but not too concerned there, right now.

Comment 1 Corey Welton 2012-01-12 18:40:27 UTC
Created attachment 552461 [details]
screenshot

Comment 3 Mike McCune 2012-01-20 01:21:10 UTC
Need to rework how we show errata since the current way really isn't that usable. Errata can exist across version boundaries very easily.

For example, *every* errata that goes into RHEL 6.1Z stream will also end up in base RHEL6.

Comment 4 Eric Helms 2012-02-10 17:23:54 UTC
b4c296f83c307cf144eede7b08ec36287140ba61

This is part of a larger set of work done to add errata search to promotions.  This in turn should provide unique errata listings.

Comment 5 Corey Welton 2012-02-17 21:32:16 UTC
QA Verified.

Comment 7 Mike McCune 2013-08-16 18:02:00 UTC
getting rid of 6.0.0 version since that doesn't exist


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.