Bug 777772 (SOA-288)

Summary: SOAPProcessor cannot handle large message backlog
Product: [JBoss] JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform 4 Reporter: Martin Vecera <mvecera>
Component: JBossESBAssignee: Tim Fox <tim.fox>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact:
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 4.2 Beta 1CC: jwulf
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 4.2 CP02   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
URL: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SOA-288
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-06-12 10:20:06 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 777849, 778034    

Description Martin Vecera 2008-01-07 17:02:23 UTC
Date of First Response: 2008-01-30 18:17:04
project_key: SOA

See linked issue.

Comment 1 Martin Vecera 2008-01-07 17:02:35 UTC
Link: Added: This issue depends JBESB-1450


Comment 2 Martin Vecera 2008-01-07 17:08:49 UTC
Link: Added: This issue related SOA-84


Comment 3 Kevin Conner 2008-01-30 23:14:48 UTC
Link: Added: This issue depends JBMESSAGING-1227


Comment 4 Kevin Conner 2008-01-30 23:17:04 UTC
JBMESSAGING-1227 is now the active task

Comment 5 Kevin Conner 2008-01-30 23:19:57 UTC
Assigning to Tim to handle the JBM issue.

Comment 6 Mark Little 2008-01-31 08:17:16 UTC
Link: Added: This issue is a dependency of SOA-377


Comment 7 Len DiMaggio 2008-01-31 14:17:11 UTC
Link: Added: This issue depends JBMESSAGING-1218


Comment 9 Mark Little 2008-02-01 06:41:34 UTC
Yes, that is correct. If we cannot fix the problem then we will document it in the Release Notes (task already created for Josh).

Comment 10 Kevin Conner 2008-02-01 16:33:27 UTC
Link: Added: This issue duplicates SOA-351


Comment 11 Kevin Conner 2008-02-01 17:05:53 UTC
There are two options for progressing this further
- Have the oracle datasource enable statement caching.  This should reduce the impact of this issue and may allow the server to function in lower volume situations
- Wait for the fix or a workaround and then validate.


Comment 12 Kevin Conner 2008-02-02 13:08:57 UTC
Martin.

I have just tried running this test using a separate DS configuration for JMS.  This separate configuration has two specific additions to the one generated by the current tool

- specifies prepared-statement-cache-size
- specified share-prepared-statements

The important configuration is the second as this forces the connection to return the *same* prepared statement, whether it has been closed or not.

Can you try rerunning your tests for this issue (and SOA-351) using the above changes?

Comment 13 Kevin Conner 2008-02-02 13:09:29 UTC
Tim.

Can you tell me if it is safe to enable share-prepared-statements for JBM?  Will this cause any issues?

Comment 14 Tim Fox 2008-02-03 17:41:17 UTC
I can't see any problems doing that.

Comment 15 Kevin Conner 2008-02-03 23:53:03 UTC
Thanks Tim, I believe this is a supportable workaround for these issues.

Martin, I believe this will solve the issue for both failure cases but we still need you to verify them.

Comment 16 Len DiMaggio 2008-02-04 18:05:32 UTC
Link: Added: This issue is related to SOA-348


Comment 18 Len DiMaggio 2008-02-04 18:38:10 UTC
Link: Added: This issue is related to JBESB-1479


Comment 19 Kevin Conner 2008-02-04 18:40:44 UTC
Link: Removed: This issue is related to SOA-348 


Comment 20 Mark Little 2008-02-05 10:48:29 UTC
Moving to CP1 as there is a workaround.

Comment 21 Kevin Conner 2008-02-27 14:03:11 UTC
Link: Removed: This issue is related to JBESB-1479 


Comment 22 Mark Little 2008-05-31 01:01:57 UTC
Downgrading because of workaround.

Comment 23 Mark Little 2008-05-31 01:03:02 UTC
Link: Added: This issue is a dependency of SOA-559


Comment 24 Martin Vecera 2008-06-03 08:46:02 UTC
Waiting for CP02 to check whether it is fixed successfully.

Comment 25 Martin Vecera 2008-06-12 10:20:05 UTC
Verified.