Bug 777772 (SOA-288) - SOAPProcessor cannot handle large message backlog
Summary: SOAPProcessor cannot handle large message backlog
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: SOA-288
Product: JBoss Enterprise SOA Platform 4
Classification: JBoss
Component: JBossESB
Version: 4.2 Beta 1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
: 4.2 CP02
Assignee: Tim Fox
QA Contact:
URL: http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SOA...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: SOA-377 SOA-559
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-01-07 17:02 UTC by Martin Vecera
Modified: 2008-06-12 10:20 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-06-12 10:20:06 UTC
Type: Bug

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 777576 0 urgent CLOSED QE BLOCKERS (links to all blocked QE tests) 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC
Red Hat Issue Tracker SOA-288 0 None None None Never

Internal Links: 777576

Description Martin Vecera 2008-01-07 17:02:23 UTC 
Date of First Response: 2008-01-30 18:17:04
project_key: SOA

See linked issue.
Comment 1 Martin Vecera 2008-01-07 17:02:35 UTC 
Link: Added: This issue depends JBESB-1450
Comment 2 Martin Vecera 2008-01-07 17:08:49 UTC 
Link: Added: This issue related SOA-84
Comment 3 Kevin Conner 2008-01-30 23:14:48 UTC 
Link: Added: This issue depends JBMESSAGING-1227
Comment 4 Kevin Conner 2008-01-30 23:17:04 UTC 
JBMESSAGING-1227 is now the active task
Comment 5 Kevin Conner 2008-01-30 23:19:57 UTC 
Assigning to Tim to handle the JBM issue.
Comment 6 Mark Little 2008-01-31 08:17:16 UTC 
Link: Added: This issue is a dependency of SOA-377
Comment 7 Len DiMaggio 2008-01-31 14:17:11 UTC 
Link: Added: This issue depends JBMESSAGING-1218
Comment 9 Mark Little 2008-02-01 06:41:34 UTC 
Yes, that is correct. If we cannot fix the problem then we will document it in the Release Notes (task already created for Josh).
Comment 10 Kevin Conner 2008-02-01 16:33:27 UTC 
Link: Added: This issue duplicates SOA-351
Comment 11 Kevin Conner 2008-02-01 17:05:53 UTC 
There are two options for progressing this further
- Have the oracle datasource enable statement caching.  This should reduce the impact of this issue and may allow the server to function in lower volume situations
- Wait for the fix or a workaround and then validate.
Comment 12 Kevin Conner 2008-02-02 13:08:57 UTC 
Martin.

I have just tried running this test using a separate DS configuration for JMS.  This separate configuration has two specific additions to the one generated by the current tool

- specifies prepared-statement-cache-size
- specified share-prepared-statements

The important configuration is the second as this forces the connection to return the *same* prepared statement, whether it has been closed or not.

Can you try rerunning your tests for this issue (and SOA-351) using the above changes?
Comment 13 Kevin Conner 2008-02-02 13:09:29 UTC 
Tim.

Can you tell me if it is safe to enable share-prepared-statements for JBM?  Will this cause any issues?
Comment 14 Tim Fox 2008-02-03 17:41:17 UTC 
I can't see any problems doing that.
Comment 15 Kevin Conner 2008-02-03 23:53:03 UTC 
Thanks Tim, I believe this is a supportable workaround for these issues.

Martin, I believe this will solve the issue for both failure cases but we still need you to verify them.
Comment 16 Len DiMaggio 2008-02-04 18:05:32 UTC 
Link: Added: This issue is related to SOA-348
Comment 18 Len DiMaggio 2008-02-04 18:38:10 UTC 
Link: Added: This issue is related to JBESB-1479
Comment 19 Kevin Conner 2008-02-04 18:40:44 UTC 
Link: Removed: This issue is related to SOA-348
Comment 20 Mark Little 2008-02-05 10:48:29 UTC 
Moving to CP1 as there is a workaround.
Comment 21 Kevin Conner 2008-02-27 14:03:11 UTC 
Link: Removed: This issue is related to JBESB-1479
Comment 22 Mark Little 2008-05-31 01:01:57 UTC 
Downgrading because of workaround.
Comment 23 Mark Little 2008-05-31 01:03:02 UTC 
Link: Added: This issue is a dependency of SOA-559
Comment 24 Martin Vecera 2008-06-03 08:46:02 UTC 
Waiting for CP02 to check whether it is fixed successfully.
Comment 25 Martin Vecera 2008-06-12 10:20:05 UTC 
Verified.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.