| Summary: | Review Request: ktoblzcheck - A library to check account numbers and bank codes of German banks | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Johannes Schmid <jhs> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Brian Pepple <bdpepple> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 16 | CC: | bdpepple, notting, package-review |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | bdpepple:
fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+ |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | goffice08-0.8.17-4.fc17 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-03-08 06:03:24 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
|
Description
Johannes Schmid
2012-01-22 21:13:55 UTC
I'm not necessarily against it, but it's not something I'd use or have the ability to check with a live accounts - it would be one of those 'build and punt all functional bugs to upstream' sort of packages. Want to help maintain/comaintain it? I can certainly test it but I doubt I will have time to maintain yet another package. I maintain far too much upstream stuff. Spec URL: http://notting.fedorapeople.org/review/ktoblzcheck.spec SRPM URL: http://notting.fedorapeople.org/review/ktoblzcheck-1.37-1.src.rpm Description: KtoBLZCheck is a library to check account numbers and bank codes of German banks. Both a library for other programs as well as a short command-line tool is available. It is possible to check pairs of account numbers and bank codes (BLZ) of German banks, and to map bank codes (BLZ) to the clear-text name and location of the bank. Good: * Source URL is canonical * Upstream source tarball verified * Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines * Group Tag is from the official list * All paths begin with macros * All directories are owned by this or other packages * All necessary BuildRequires listed. * Builds fine in mock. * Doesn't contain any .la libtool archives. Minor Non-blockers: * I believe the clean section & the %defattr in the files section are not necessary anymore. * rpmlint errors: ktoblzcheck.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/ktoblzcheck-1.37/NEWS ktoblzcheck.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/ktoblzcheck-1.37/COPYING ktoblzcheck.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/ktoblzcheck-1.37/ChangeLog +1 Package Approved. Those rpmlint errors can be corrected when you import the package. New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: ktoblzcheck Short Description: A library to check account numbers and bank codes of German banks Owners: notting Branches: f17 f16 el6 InitialCC: Git done (by process-git-requests). Built, will go out in rawhide tomorrow, and in earlier releases with gnucash-2.4.10 update. goffice08-0.8.17-4.fc17, gnucash-2.4.10-1.fc17, ktoblzcheck-1.37-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnucash-2.4.10-1.fc17,goffice08-0.8.17-4.fc17,ktoblzcheck-1.37-1.fc17 Package goffice08-0.8.17-4.fc17, gnucash-2.4.10-1.fc17, ktoblzcheck-1.37-1.fc17: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing goffice08-0.8.17-4.fc17 gnucash-2.4.10-1.fc17 ktoblzcheck-1.37-1.fc17' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-2822/gnucash-2.4.10-1.fc17,goffice08-0.8.17-4.fc17,ktoblzcheck-1.37-1.fc17 then log in and leave karma (feedback). goffice08-0.8.17-4.fc17, gnucash-2.4.10-1.fc17, ktoblzcheck-1.37-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. Thanks! |