Bug 78798

Summary: Installer displays an unhandled exception when checking blocks
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: Quentin Smith <linuxrh>
Component: anacondaAssignee: Michael Fulbright <msf>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Brock Organ <borgan>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 7.3   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: athlon   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2002-11-30 18:39:36 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Description Flags
Details of unhandled exception created by Anaconda none

Description Quentin Smith 2002-11-30 18:37:59 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98; Win 9x 4.90; 
Q312461; Hotbar

Description of problem:
While installing from the text interface, the option to check blocks on each 
partition has been selected. The installer then begins to check the blocks in 
each partition and displays a message that an unhandled exception has occurred 
in dev/hda2. The installer then prompts me to save the text of the unhandled 
exception. See attachment.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Install Linux 7.3 using text interface.
2.Select each partition to check the blocks for each partition
3.Complete installation options
4.Allow install to run checking the blocks of each partition.

Actual Results:  Received error message stating that an unhandled exception had 

Expected Results:  If there was no unhandled exception error, the installation 
should have continued to the end.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Quentin Smith 2002-11-30 18:39:30 UTC
Created attachment 86924 [details]
Details of unhandled exception created by Anaconda

Comment 2 Michael Fulbright 2002-12-02 16:00:22 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 66181 ***