Bug 790690
Summary: | quota should be using portreserve | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Karel Srot <ksrot> |
Component: | quota | Assignee: | Petr Pisar <ppisar> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | qe-baseos-daemons |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 6.2 | CC: | ovasik |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-02-23 13:32:36 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 103401 |
Description
Karel Srot
2012-02-15 08:07:37 UTC
quota_nld executable is an RPC service. I think the portreserve hack is intended for non-RPC services. So I think this request is not applicable to quota package. You are right that portreserve hack is intended for non-RPC services - as RPC services usually use dynamic (and random between 600-1023) port. This is the default case even for quota_nld, so if you think that using portreserve for port 875 is not a good idea, feel free to close this report. I'm not really sure, how this will work for service opened via portmap, even if this will be on static port in reserved area. Yes, default quota_nld configuration is to select random port through rpcbind. So adding portreserve has no sense. |