Bug 798654

Summary: Review Request: cmpi-bindings - CMPI-compliant provider interface for various languages via SWIG
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Vitezslav Crhonek <vcrhonek>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Jan Safranek <jsafrane>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: jsafrane, notting, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Flags: jsafrane: fedora-review+
gwync: fedora-cvs+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-03-13 10:59:44 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Vitezslav Crhonek 2012-02-29 14:07:17 UTC
Spec URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/cmpi-bindings/cmpi-bindings.spec
SRPM URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/cmpi-bindings/cmpi-bindings-0.4.17-1.fc16.src.rpm
Description: CMPI-compliant provider interface for various languages via SWIG

Comment 1 Jan Safranek 2012-03-02 15:24:46 UTC
Rpmlint output:
cmpi-bindings.src: W: invalid-url Source0: cmpi-bindings-0.4.17.tar.bz2
    This looks fine, upstream does not have a website.

cmpi-bindings-pywbem.x86_64: W: no-documentation
    At least upstream README and LICENSE should be there. I'd appreciate also some README.Fedora which would specify, where python providers are expected.

The package should create and own /usr/lib/pythonX.Y/site-packages/pycim directory.

Otherwise, all MUST review items are OK.

Comment 2 Vitezslav Crhonek 2012-03-08 13:28:45 UTC
Fixed version:
http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/cmpi-bindings/cmpi-bindings.spec
http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/cmpi-bindings/cmpi-bindings-0.4.17-2.fc16.src.rpm


(In reply to comment #1)
> Rpmlint output:
> cmpi-bindings.src: W: invalid-url Source0: cmpi-bindings-0.4.17.tar.bz2
>     This looks fine, upstream does not have a website.
> 
> cmpi-bindings-pywbem.x86_64: W: no-documentation
>     At least upstream README and LICENSE should be there. I'd appreciate also
> some README.Fedora which would specify, where python providers are expected.

Documentation added, README.Fedora created (please let me know whether the content is ok).

> 
> The package should create and own /usr/lib/pythonX.Y/site-packages/pycim
> directory.

Fixed.

> 
> Otherwise, all MUST review items are OK.

Comment 3 Jan Safranek 2012-03-09 09:05:15 UTC
Now it's perfect, thanks!

Comment 4 Vitezslav Crhonek 2012-03-12 12:39:03 UTC
New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: cmpi-bindings
Short Description: CMPI-compliant provider interface for various languages via SWIG
Owners: vcrhonek
Branches: f16 f17
InitialCC:

Comment 5 Gwyn Ciesla 2012-03-12 12:59:46 UTC
Git done (by process-git-requests).