| Summary: | Missing desktop icon of swell-foop | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Petr Schindler <pschindl> |
| Component: | gnome-games | Assignee: | Ray Strode [halfline] <rstrode> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 17 | CC: | mclasen, rstrode |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-03-24 23:31:02 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 752650 | ||
|
Description
Petr Schindler
2012-02-29 14:49:15 UTC
I propose this bug as a final blocker. It violates the criterion "Menu sanity - All Applications listed in the system menus (or equivalent) must have icons which have a consistent appearance and sufficiently high resolution to avoid appearing blurry" Icons are included in the 3.3.90 packages, at least: $ rpm -ql gnome-games-extra | grep icon | grep swell-foop /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/swell-foop.png /usr/share/icons/hicolor/22x22/apps/swell-foop.png /usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24/apps/swell-foop.png /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/swell-foop.png /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/swell-foop.png /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps/swell-foop.svg That changes nothing on the fact, that those files should be in gnome-games package, where swell-foop is. This bug is still Final blocker. I can confirm, that icons are on the right place after I installed gnome-games-extra. It seems to me very strange when swell-foop is in different package then its icons. Those two things should be in one package. It doesn't matter in which one. Ah, I didn't notice the package split at all, sorry Should be fixed in the .92 packages |