Bug 798673 - Missing desktop icon of swell-foop
Summary: Missing desktop icon of swell-foop
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gnome-games
Version: 17
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ray Strode [halfline]
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Keywords: Reopened
Depends On:
Blocks: F17Blocker, F17FinalBlocker
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2012-02-29 14:49 UTC by Petr Schindler
Modified: 2012-03-24 23:31 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2012-03-24 23:31:02 UTC

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Petr Schindler 2012-02-29 14:49:15 UTC
Description of problem:
There is missing an icon of swell-foop in application menu (in activities)

Desktop file has defined 'Icon=' line correctly, but there aren't icons in /usr/share/icons/ folder.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Clear installation of Alpha.RC4

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install from Alpha RC4 - there isn't icon of swell-foop in applications menu

Actual results:
Icon is missing in applications menu

Expected results:
There should be icon

Additional info:

Comment 1 Petr Schindler 2012-02-29 14:50:38 UTC
I propose this bug as a final blocker. It violates the criterion "Menu sanity -
All Applications listed in the system menus (or equivalent) must have icons
which have a consistent appearance and sufficiently high resolution to avoid
appearing blurry"

Comment 2 Matthias Clasen 2012-03-11 23:44:15 UTC
Icons are included in the 3.3.90 packages, at least:

$ rpm -ql gnome-games-extra | grep icon | grep swell-foop

Comment 3 Petr Schindler 2012-03-14 15:13:22 UTC
That changes nothing on the fact, that those files should be in gnome-games package, where swell-foop is. This bug is still Final blocker. I can confirm, that icons are on the right place after I installed gnome-games-extra.

It seems to me very strange when swell-foop is in different package then its icons.

Those two things should be in one package. It doesn't matter in which one.

Comment 4 Matthias Clasen 2012-03-15 20:09:09 UTC
Ah, I didn't notice the package split at all, sorry

Comment 5 Matthias Clasen 2012-03-24 23:31:02 UTC
Should be fixed in the .92 packages

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.