Bug 802240
| Summary: | openldap should be using portreserve | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Karel Srot <ksrot> |
| Component: | openldap | Assignee: | Jan Vcelak <jvcelak> |
| Status: | CLOSED CANTFIX | QA Contact: | BaseOS QE Security Team <qe-baseos-security> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 5.0 | CC: | dspurek, jsynacek, omoris, ovasik, tsmetana |
| Target Milestone: | rc | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | 790687 | Environment: | |
| Last Closed: | 2012-03-14 09:16:40 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 103401 | ||
|
Description
Karel Srot
2012-03-12 08:02:50 UTC
Ups, I just realized that portreserve is not available on RHEL5. Therefore the port reserve conflict cannot be fixed this way. @Devel, pls, close this bug if you can't find other way how to avoid the conflict. Unfortunately no easy way to do this without portreserve. I haven't found any reference to this problem in RHEL5 even with other components. I can only suggest not to use ldaps port (636). Use ldap port (389) which is out of the affected range. And enforce StartTLS by server. See 'require', 'security', and 'sasl-secprops' options in sldap.conf. SSF is the setting you are looking for. Closing. |