Bug 804049
Summary: | mention that SHA256 is used for file digest | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 | Reporter: | Karel Srot <ksrot> |
Component: | rpm | Assignee: | Panu Matilainen <pmatilai> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Patrik Kis <pkis> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 6.2 | CC: | ffesti, pkis, pschiffe |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | ManPageChange |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2013-02-21 10:51:21 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Karel Srot
2012-03-16 12:00:00 UTC
Rpm uses whatever digest it was configured to use when building packages. RHEL-6 content has SHA256 file digests, older packages have MD5 and 3rd party packages could (although there's not much point in doing so) use something different still. So it's not a case of s/MD5/SHA256/, more like s/MD5/digest/ but it's not that straightforward either as there are places where MD5 is still used, such as the pkgid. In other words, it's not a straightforward 'perl -pi -e "s/MD5/SHA256/"' job and dunno if it's really worth the trouble for rhel-6 at this point, there are probably more important issues to address. Obviously the terminology should be fixed at least upstream sooner or later. 'perl -pi -e "s/MD5/SHA256/"' is not what I ment. Actually, I think that mentioning that other digest than MD5 are possible would be fine. This request was not resolved in time for the current release. Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to propose this request, if still desired, for consideration in the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux. This request was erroneously removed from consideration in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4, which is currently under development. This request will be evaluated for inclusion in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4. This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux release for currently deployed products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in a release. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0461.html |