Bug 8069
| Summary: | syntax error in vim.h (vim 5.5) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Raw Hide | Reporter: | trent jarvi <trentjarvi> |
| Component: | vim | Assignee: | Bernhard Rosenkraenzer <bero> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 1.0 | CC: | trentjarvi |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2000-01-06 17:18:34 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
trent jarvi
1999-12-30 17:48:57 UTC
Bram: I submitted the patch to redhat also. Maybe its best to have distros keep a seperate patch outside of the prestine source in the situation you describe. The error is caused by a bad system setup. I was just trying to reduce 560 lines of meaningless gcc warnings and errors to 1 coherent error. If some preprocessors cant handle it I can see your point. On linux #error makes more sense. Packages are an easy way to deal with this issue. Trent Jarvi trentjarvi --- Bram Moolenaar <Bram> wrote: > > Trent - > > > --- vim-5.5/src/vim.h Thu Sep 9 09:13:43 1999 > > +++ house-vim-5.5/src/vim.h Thu Dec 30 09:54:11 1999 > > @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ > > * test program. Other items from configure may also be wrong then! > > */ > > # if (SIZEOF_INT == 0) > > - Error: configure did not run properly. Check config.log. > > +#error Error: configure did not run properly. Check config.log. > > # endif > > #endif > > That's how it was before, but this caused trouble for some compilers. Did you > have trouble with how it is now? > > - Bram > [I guess I should mention this all started with configure failing to write the test file for sizeof(int) on a near full fs.] --- Bram Moolenaar <Bram> wrote: > > > I submitted the patch to redhat also. Maybe its best to have > > distros keep a seperate patch outside of the prestine source > > in the situation you describe. > > It's alright if this is patched in a Linux distribution where gcc is always > used. I don't think this needs to be fixed - sizeof(int) is not 0 on Linux, so first of all you aren't getting to this place unless something's very wrong. Also, both versions will generate an error, and point you to the same place. |